Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-03 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:11 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:38 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:56 AM Eshan dhawan wrote: >> > >> > --- >> > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 42 +++- >> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-02 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:38 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:56 AM Eshan dhawan > wrote: > > > > --- > > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 42 +++- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-02 Thread Eshan Dhawan
I will send a patch with all the corrections. thanks --Eshan On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 9:38 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:56 AM Eshan dhawan > wrote: > > > > --- > > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 42 +++- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-02 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:35 PM Aditya Upadhyay wrote: > Hi Eshan, > > Thanks for pointing this out again. I would appreciate if you can send > here a new v1 patch for the > fenv methods. I can see the list of functions what you have left > there, without any test. > https://lists.rtems.org/piperm

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-02 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:56 AM Eshan dhawan wrote: > > --- > testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 42 +++- > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c > b/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c > index 05f3cdc88

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-02 Thread Aditya Upadhyay
Hi Eshan, Thanks for pointing this out again. I would appreciate if you can send here a new v1 patch for the fenv methods. I can see the list of functions what you have left there, without any test. https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-February/057669.html Could you please remove this? I

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-03-01 Thread Eshan Dhawan
hello everyone, I am new here and I sent the patches: 1. > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-February/057669.html 2. > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-February/057671.html 3. > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-February/057711.html a few days ago. for adding tests

Re: [PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-02-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
added tests for fegetround and fesetround in psxtests / psxfenv01 fegetround fails to send the rounding direction due to soft float and returns to_nearest or zero in the cases fesetround sends zero if the rounding direction is set and sends anything else if the function fails to set the rounding

[PATCH] test for fegetround and fesetround

2020-02-25 Thread Eshan dhawan
--- testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c | 42 +++- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c index 05f3cdc880..4339139c58 100644 --- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxfenv01/init.c +++