On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:40 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/9/2022 5:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 08/09/2022 08:56, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> Is the score going to be run through clang-format?
> >
> > I gave up finding the proper clang-format configuration which is close
> > to the RTEMS style
On 8/9/2022 5:23 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/09/2022 08:56, Chris Johns wrote:
Is the score going to be run through clang-format?
I gave up finding the proper clang-format configuration which is close
to the RTEMS style.
I thought it was decided to get as close as possible and adjust
On 08/09/2022 08:56, Chris Johns wrote:
Is the score going to be run through clang-format?
I gave up finding the proper clang-format configuration which is close
to the RTEMS style. Is there someone else working on this?
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchhe
Hi,
Is the score going to be run through clang-format? If it is should we
bother going this?
Chris
On 8/9/2022 4:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 14 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 14 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h
b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h
index af732df3d3..c182ea02ec 100644
--- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h
+++ b/cpukit/