Re: [PATCH] rtems-tools/covoar: -f switch was not used to select coverage format

On 1/24/19 4:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:46 AM Jiri Gaisler > wrote: > > > On 1/24/19 2:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 6:38 AM Jiri Gaisler > wrote: >> >> Small patch t

Re: [PATCH] rtems-tools/covoar: -f switch was not used to select coverage format

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:46 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote: > > On 1/24/19 2:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 6:38 AM Jiri Gaisler >> Small patch to fix covoar to work with TSIM coverage files. It should be >> noted that covoar erroneously marks some code as uncovered while it i

Re: [PATCH] rtems-tools/covoar: -f switch was not used to select coverage format

On 1/24/19 2:19 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 6:38 AM Jiri Gaisler wrote: > > Small patch to fix covoar to work with TSIM coverage files. It > should be noted that covoar erroneously marks some code as > uncovered while it is marked as c

Re: [PATCH] rtems-tools/covoar: -f switch was not used to select coverage format

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019, 6:38 AM Jiri Gaisler Small patch to fix covoar to work with TSIM coverage files. It should be > noted that covoar erroneously marks some code as uncovered while it is > marked as covered in the coverage file. This seems to be due to incorrect > parsing of the symbol table in

[PATCH] rtems-tools/covoar: -f switch was not used to select coverage format

Small patch to fix covoar to work with TSIM coverage files. It should be noted that covoar erroneously marks some code as uncovered while it is marked as covered in the coverage file. This seems to be due to incorrect parsing of the symbol table in the exec file. I will file a ticket for this on