On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Stavros Passas wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> Yesterday, with the creation of the ticket about the issue, (
> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2867)
> I also uploaded the patch that was fixing it -- after Chris's suggestion
> over email.
>
> The patch was created with my ful
Hi Joel,
Yesterday, with the creation of the ticket about the issue, (
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2867)
I also uploaded the patch that was fixing it -- after Chris's suggestion
over email.
The patch was created with my full credentials, so you can take them from
here:
https://devel.rtems.org/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> This change looks wrong. Moving test loop out of the if testdata block
> means variables in the test loop are not defined. I consider it a script
> bug to assume it is ok to reference a variable that is not declared
> because it is ambiguous i
This change looks wrong. Moving test loop out of the if testdata block
means variables in the test loop are not defined. I consider it a script
bug to assume it is ok to reference a variable that is not declared
because it is ambiguous if this intended behavior or a bug.
Starvos sent me this chang
closes #2867.
---
tools/build/rtems-test-check | 90 ++--
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/build/rtems-test-check b/tools/build/rtems-test-check
index e02f8e9..e8acde0 100755
--- a/tools/build/rtems-test-check
+++ b/tools
