Re: [PATCH] rtems: Adjust parameter names

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, 6:23 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 30/9/21 6:30 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, 3:24 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > Is it worth mentioning in the commit message the reserved nature of > time is the > > reason for the chang

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Adjust parameter names

On 30/9/21 6:30 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, 3:24 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > Is it worth mentioning in the commit message the reserved nature of time > is the > reason for the change? > > > Do you mean the method time()? No. I checked the

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Adjust parameter names

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, 3:24 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Is it worth mentioning in the commit message the reserved nature of time > is the > reason for the change? > Do you mean the method time()? > > Otherwise OK. > > On 30/9/21 12:10 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Adjust parameter names to match wi

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Adjust parameter names

Is it worth mentioning in the commit message the reserved nature of time is the reason for the change? Otherwise OK. On 30/9/21 12:10 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Adjust parameter names to match with the declaration. > > Close #4035. > --- > cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettod.c| 20 ++

[PATCH] rtems: Adjust parameter names

Adjust parameter names to match with the declaration. Close #4035. --- cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettod.c| 20 ++-- cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettodtimeval.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettod.c b/cpukit/rtems