On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 20:48, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 22.02.23 16:14, Hesham Almatary wrote:
> > * Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
> > RV64 BSPs are now all medany by default.
>
> Do we still need the non-medany 64-bit multilibs in GCC? I plan to
> adjust the multilib selec
On 22.02.23 16:14, Hesham Almatary wrote:
* Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
RV64 BSPs are now all medany by default.
Do we still need the non-medany 64-bit multilibs in GCC? I plan to
adjust the multilib selection a bit and also add multilibs for
non-compact 32-bit variants.
This is OK.
Be sure to follow up with a patch to bump the rtems-tools hash in the RSB.
--joel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:14 AM Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> * Only use BSPs supported by GCC's multilibs. This removes rv32imafdc
> * Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
> RV64 BSPs are now
* Only use BSPs supported by GCC's multilibs. This removes rv32imafdc
* Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
RV64 BSPs are now all medany by default.
---
config/rtems-bsps-riscv.ini | 5 ++---
config/rtems-bsps-tiers.ini | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
dif