On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:31 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 17/05/2019 21:38, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> > I assume you intentionally left the gap in numbering of POSIX API
> > classes for historical consistency. But it does leave a gap in the
> > _Objects_Inf
On 17/05/2019 21:38, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I assume you intentionally left the gap in numbering of POSIX API
classes for historical consistency. But it does leave a gap in the
_Objects_Information_Table and wastes a tiny bit of RAM.
Yes, there are already gaps in the POSIX API classes. Why we
Hi
I have no idea where POSIX Interrupts came from. That doesn't match
anything in the POSIX standard or any draft I have seen.
I assume you intentionally left the gap in numbering of POSIX API classes
for historical consistency. But it does leave a gap in the
_Objects_Information_Table and waste
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/objectdata.h | 1 -
cpukit/rtems/src/rtemsobjectgetapiclassname.c | 3 ---
2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/objectdata.h
b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/objectdata.h
index f6ece16c0e..ce6e3c63a4 100644
--- a/cpukit/include/
