On 26/02/2019 07:29, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25/02/2019 22:46, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
The patch looks like it is masking something but I am not sure.
What are the errors at -O0 the patch is attempting to resolve?
Which BSP is showing the issue?
What is the multilib ARM arch?
The ARMv7-M i
On 25/02/2019 22:46, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
The patch looks like it is masking something but I am not sure.
What are the errors at -O0 the patch is attempting to resolve?
Which BSP is showing the issue?
What is the multilib ARM arch?
The ARMv7-M is affected by this.
Are these errors seen
Hi,
The patch looks like it is masking something but I am not sure.
What are the errors at -O0 the patch is attempting to resolve?
Which BSP is showing the issue?
What is the multilib ARM arch?
Are these errors seen at -O2 and if not why does -O0 cause them?
The intention is for the ARM back e
---
cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c
b/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c
index 722dd54924..95e26ada76 100644
--- a/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-arm.c
+++ b/