Re: [PATCH] fsnofs01/init.c: Check for ENOENT from utime().

2021-06-09 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:43 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/06/2021 20:16, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > The addition of the entire*utime*() family of functions resulted > > in this call returning ENOENT not ENXIO. This is better aligned > > with the POSIX defin

Re: [PATCH] fsnofs01/init.c: Check for ENOENT from utime().

2021-06-08 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08/06/2021 20:16, Joel Sherrill wrote: The addition of the entire*utime*() family of functions resulted in this call returning ENOENT not ENXIO. This is better aligned with the POSIX definition of the methods. Does this utime(path, NULL) call essentially fail because the fstat_h handler ret

[PATCH] fsnofs01/init.c: Check for ENOENT from utime().

2021-06-08 Thread Joel Sherrill
The addition of the entire *utime*() family of functions resulted in this call returning ENOENT not ENXIO. This is better aligned with the POSIX definition of the methods. --- testsuites/fstests/fsnofs01/init.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites