Re: [PATCH] eng: Requirements counting shall start at zero

2020-12-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 12/12/20 12:34 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I don't mind starting 0 or 1, consistency is important.  > > If we know the max count (N) ahead of time, it can be helpful to generate > with a > 0-padded number. +1 > This makes every name a consistent size and can be sorted > lexicographically. I

Re: [PATCH] eng: Requirements counting shall start at zero

2020-12-11 Thread Gedare Bloom
I don't mind starting 0 or 1, consistency is important. If we know the max count (N) ahead of time, it can be helpful to generate with a 0-padded number. This makes every name a consistent size and can be sorted lexicographically. On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:50 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@e

Re: [PATCH] eng: Requirements counting shall start at zero

2020-12-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Andrew, On 09/12/2020 14:47, Andrew Butterfield wrote:  I plan to generate numbered test sources - should these also be numbered from 0? E.g.  tr-model-events-mgr-n.c  - I was going to have `n` range from 1..N -- should I adopt the same convention as you suggest for consistency? if we agr

Re: [PATCH] eng: Requirements counting shall start at zero

2020-12-09 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Frank, I plan to generate numbered test sources - should these also be numbered from 0? E.g. tr-model-events-mgr-n.c - I was going to have `n` range from 1..N -- should I adopt the same convention as you suggest for consistency? Regards, Andrew > On 9 Dec 2020, at 13:36, Frank Kuehndel

[PATCH] eng: Requirements counting shall start at zero

2020-12-09 Thread Frank Kuehndel
From: Frank Kühndel --- eng/req/req-for-req.rst | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/eng/req/req-for-req.rst b/eng/req/req-for-req.rst index 9225e95..8345e35 100644 --- a/eng/req/req-for-req.rst +++ b/eng/req/req-for-req.rst @@ -308,6 +308,14 @@ spec:/classic/task/create-e