On 5/6/21 8:11 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:17 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> On the surface, this looks OK to me. But I remember looking at this one
>> and wondering if there was any cleanup required because of the various
>> subroutine calls as you work down through this met
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:17 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> On the surface, this looks OK to me. But I remember looking at this one
> and wondering if there was any cleanup required because of the various
> subroutine calls as you work down through this method.
>
> Did you look into each of the subrou
On the surface, this looks OK to me. But I remember looking at this one
and wondering if there was any cleanup required because of the various
subroutine calls as you work down through this method.
Did you look into each of the subroutines called and make sure they
didn't do further allocations?
See also CID 1439298
Closes #3570
---
cpukit/libblock/src/flashdisk.c | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/libblock/src/flashdisk.c b/cpukit/libblock/src/flashdisk.c
index 91f99e0d52..4de6ecd807 100644
--- a/cpukit/libblock/src/flashdisk.c
+++ b/cpukit/libb