On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:42 AM Alex White wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:22 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:05 AM Alex White wrote:
> > >
> > > The `rangeIndex` variable is 1 higher than the index at which the first
> > > instruction address was found. This fix
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:22 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:05 AM Alex White wrote:
> >
> > The `rangeIndex` variable is 1 higher than the index at which the first
> > instruction address was found. This fixes the lookup after the loop to
> > account for that fact.
> > ---
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:05 AM Alex White wrote:
>
> The `rangeIndex` variable is 1 higher than the index at which the first
> instruction address was found. This fixes the lookup after the loop to
> account for that fact.
> ---
> tester/covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.cc | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 in
The `rangeIndex` variable is 1 higher than the index at which the first
instruction address was found. This fixes the lookup after the loop to
account for that fact.
---
tester/covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/ObjdumpProce
