Re: [PATCH] bsps/irq: Clarify interrupt vector operations

2023-02-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 10.02.23 16:08, Gedare Bloom wrote: Minor nit, I think "implementation-defined" as used in programming language standards is better but "implementation-specific" as used here is acceptable. Thanks for the review, I will change it to implementation-defined. -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebas

Re: [PATCH] bsps/irq: Clarify interrupt vector operations

2023-02-10 Thread Gedare Bloom
Minor nit, I think "implementation-defined" as used in programming language standards is better but "implementation-specific" as used here is acceptable. On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:45 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Clarify that the presence of error conditions is > implementation-specific. > > Clo

[PATCH] bsps/irq: Clarify interrupt vector operations

2023-02-09 Thread Sebastian Huber
Clarify that the presence of error conditions is implementation-specific. Close #4843. --- bsps/include/bsp/irq-generic.h | 27 +-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/include/bsp/irq-generic.h b/bsps/include/bsp/irq-generic.h index bbfb1979