Re: [PATCH] Test for clock_nanosleep() with CLOCK_MONOTONIC option.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 4:33 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Rationale for a new test- > > >Although most of the test cases for this test have been taken from > >clockrealtime, > adding it to the current test with CLOCK_MONOTONIC may break the existing > cases. > > >This test has a new case which test

[PATCH] Test for clock_nanosleep() with CLOCK_MONOTONIC option.

Rationale for a new test- >Although most of the test cases for this test have been taken from >clockrealtime, adding it to the current test with CLOCK_MONOTONIC may break the existing cases. >This test has a new case which tests for no change of delay with monotonic >clock when the realtime clo

Re: [PATCH] Test for clock_nanosleep with CLOCK_MONOTONIC option.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 6:05 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > This test checks for a simple 1 ns delay with clock_nanosleep with > CLOCK_MONOTONIC. > --- > testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 9 +++ > testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + > .../psxtests/psxclocknanosleep01/i

[PATCH] Test for clock_nanosleep with CLOCK_MONOTONIC option.

This test checks for a simple 1 ns delay with clock_nanosleep with CLOCK_MONOTONIC. --- testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 9 +++ testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + .../psxtests/psxclocknanosleep01/init.c | 81 +++ .../psxclocknanosleep01.doc