On 10/1/19 7:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/01/2019 09:19, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 10/01/2019 00:42, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
>>> Sorry to revisit this change. I have reviewed the genera
On 10/01/2019 09:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/01/2019 09:19, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/01/2019 00:42, Chris Johns wrote:
On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
Sorry to revisit this change. I have reviewed the generated the docs
On 10/01/2019 09:19, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/01/2019 00:42, Chris Johns wrote:
On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
Sorry to revisit this change. I have reviewed the generated the docs
and they
look good and the changes are welc
On 10/01/2019 00:42, Chris Johns wrote:
On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
Sorry to revisit this change. I have reviewed the generated the docs and they
look good and the changes are welcome, thank you. I would like to ask a few
que
On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
Sorry to revisit this change. I have reviewed the generated the docs and they
look good and the changes are welcome, thank you. I would like to ask a few
questions.
1. Can the hash be the short ver
On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
Nice.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
---
common/conf.py | 25 +
common/waf.py | 22 ++
wscript| 39 ---
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/conf.py b/comm
