Re: [PATCH] RSB: update newlib version built with gcc-4.9.3

On 08/06/2016 23:51, Sebastian Huber wrote: Given the file name rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cf, how does this fit to the new file content? We have this *-N.cfg pattern throughout. What is the rule for the N? Is it useful at all? This was present when we had no branching in the repo to help m

Re: [PATCH] RSB: update newlib version built with gcc-4.9.3

On 08/06/16 00:49, Hesham Almatary wrote: --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg index 596a4

Re: [PATCH] RSB: update newlib version built with gcc-4.9.3

Hi Hesham, Looks fine to commit. Do you have commit write access? Chris On 8/06/2016 8:49 AM, Hesham Almatary wrote: --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.

[PATCH] RSB: update newlib version built with gcc-4.9.3

--- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.9.3-newlib-2.4.0-1.cfg index 596a4a7..42f6cfa 100644 --- a/rtems/config/tools/rt