I think these << >> blocks ought to be typeset as inline code blocks?
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:03 AM, Dannie Huang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Dannie Huang
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is the initial implementatio
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Dannie Huang
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the initial implementation commit of converting newlib markup to
> > rst, the example .rst file looks like this photo (see attached photo
> > please).
> >
>
> Can
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Dannie Huang wrote:
> From: Danxue Huang <36866155+dh0...@users.noreply.github.com>
>
> ---
> .gitignore | 2 +
> README.md | 2 +
> gen_rst_from_makedoc.py | 125
>
> rst.py
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Dannie Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the initial implementation commit of converting newlib markup to
> rst, the example .rst file looks like this photo (see attached photo
> please).
>
Can we see a side-by-side comparison with how newlib's documentation looks?
From: Danxue Huang <36866155+dh0...@users.noreply.github.com>
---
.gitignore | 2 +
README.md | 2 +
gen_rst_from_makedoc.py | 125
rst.py | 104
strcmp.rst
