Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test

2020-08-19 Thread Richi Dubey
Hi, Sorry, I left the meeting early. It was earlier : > SET_PRIORITY( T2,P(2), T2, T0, T1), but now after checking thoroughly, I can confirm that it ought to be (because of the way affinities are set and checked while running the get_lowest_scheduled logic) : SET_PRIORITY( T2,P(2), T2, T1,

Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test

2020-08-19 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi Richi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:52 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Hi, > > I would request someone to please verify if this patch looks correct since I > am testing my code on this test. The logic is taken from the paper and I was > wondering if the reset function is handled correctly in this tes

Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test

2020-08-19 Thread Richi Dubey
Hi, I would request someone to please verify if this patch looks correct since I am testing my code on this test. The logic is taken from the paper and I was wondering if the reset function is handled correctly in this test because I still h

[PATCH] Add Strong APA test

2020-08-19 Thread Richi Dubey
--- testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa01/init.c | 85 +-- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa01/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa01/init.c index bf8bc05231..89cc6404b9 100644 --- a/testsuites/smptests/smpstrong

Re: [PATCH] Add Strong APA test 02

2020-07-28 Thread Richi Dubey
Hi, This is the required test case based on the paper ( https://people.mpi-sws.org/~bbb/papers/pdf/rtss14f.pdf) that tests if the Strong APA scheduler is working as intended. I have checked and this compiles with no warnings/errors. Thanks. Richi. On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:23 PM Richi Dubey wro

[PATCH] Add Strong APA test 02

2020-07-28 Thread Richi Dubey
--- testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa02/init.c | 358 ++ .../smpstrongapa02/smpstrongapa02.doc | 26 ++ .../smpstrongapa02/smpstrongapa02.scn | 2 + 3 files changed, 386 insertions(+) create mode 100644 testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa02/init.c create mode 1