Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add BSP_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION

2015-02-26 Thread Martin Galvan
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello Martin, > > can you please use BSP_START_* and bsp_start_* prefixes. Since this > bsp_init_registers_banked seems to be FIQ specific it should reflect this in > its name. The term banked it used in so many different places, e.g.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Add BSP_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION

2015-02-26 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Martin, can you please use BSP_START_* and bsp_start_* prefixes. Since this bsp_init_registers_banked seems to be FIQ specific it should reflect this in its name. The term banked it used in so many different places, e.g. hypervisor mode etc. On 25/02/15 15:52, Martin Galvan wrote: Fol

[PATCH] ARM: Add BSP_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION

2015-02-25 Thread Martin Galvan
Follow-up from here: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/009974.html This patch adds the macro BSP_NEEDS_REGISTER_INITIALIZATION and three hooks for BSP-specific register init code to arm/shared/start.S. Said hooks are bsp_init_registers_core (intended for initializing the ARM