Fix for #2876

2017-05-18 Thread Stavros Passas
Hello all, I noticed there are some bugs in trac with the "need funding" tag (which I guess means they are unassigned). Thus I said to try helping knocking them down, so here is a fix for ticket #2876: >From f40a4325568e36749e5a762504cc27863fadbfd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: S

C++ thread library

2017-02-08 Thread Stavros Passas
Hello all, I would like to know which is the proper way configuring our tool chain for gnu threads support. Currently if RTEMS thread compatibility is selected, gthr-rtems.h is used, which enables #define __GTHREADS 1 If instead of RTEMS, POSIX thread compatibility is selected, gthr-posix.h is

[PATCH] Complete STACK_CHECKER_EXTENSION

2017-01-30 Thread Stavros Passas
Hello guys, I am not sure if that's the correct place to send/discuss fixes, if not just say the word. Remove warnings when using STACK_CHECKER_EXTENSION. Fixes #2889 --- cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/stackchk.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/stackchk.h

Re: Unable to build rtems-docs Was: Re: [PATCH] Update RMS documentation for overrun handling

2017-01-17 Thread Stavros Passas
On 17 January 2017 at 15:39, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Chris Johns wrote: >> > On 14/1/17 8:21 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> I was unable to compile rtems-docs (cleanly), so I have not committed >> >> th

Re: [PATCH] rtems-test-check: Make exclude work again.

2017-01-17 Thread Stavros Passas
Hi Joel, Yesterday, with the creation of the ticket about the issue, ( https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2867) I also uploaded the patch that was fixing it -- after Chris's suggestion over email. The patch was created with my full credentials, so you can take them from here: https://devel.rtems.org/