Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

2019-06-07 Thread Maksim Kozlov
Hi, Sebastian On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 08:33, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 06/06/2019 18:11, Maksim Kozlov wrote: > > Hello, Sebastian > > > > I think that this patch is necessary in two reasons. > > > > In general view, i

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

2019-06-06 Thread Maksim Kozlov
rocedure works, therefore your help would be very desirable. When I get more debugging information, I'll provide it. But it takes some time. -- Best regards, Maksim Kozlov On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 16:13, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Maksim, > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sparc: Fix mistakenly cleared PSR[EF] bit.

2019-06-06 Thread Maksim Kozlov
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:57, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 05/06/2019 21:22, Maksim E. Kozlov wrote: > > --- > > cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_asm.S | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/cpu_a

Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc: Fix missed restoring of PSR in syscall_lazy_fp_switch

2019-06-06 Thread Maksim Kozlov
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:43, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello Maksim, > > thanks for the bug report and the fix. I added a ticket for it: > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3756 > > I checked in a slightly modified patch: > > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit

Minor bug in libmisc

2019-01-23 Thread Maksim Kozlov
e attached small patch resolves this. -- Best regards, Maksim Kozlov >From d48f4c13c61a9287ddf55b33564ce4816e77f40b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maksim E. Kozlov Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:17:44 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] libmisc: Fix swapped parameters and enable floating point usage. --- cp

Re: [PATCH] sb: Optional location of the patches directory

2018-02-20 Thread Maksim Kozlov
On 20 February 2018 at 01:52, Chris Johns wrote: > I have pushed this. > > Would it be possible to get a patch for the documentation? > ​Yes, sure. I just overlooked that. Thanks for reminding. (patch should be included in my previous message) -- Best regards, MK ___