Re: [PATCH 1/5] bsps: Use bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp

On 19.03.24 03:21, Chris Johns wrote: Does this patch series build at the per commit level? I used ./waf bspdefaults > a.txt apply patch ./waf bspdefaults > b.txt diff a.txt b.txt to check that the defaults don't change. I will build the BSPs for each commit today. -- embedded brains GmbH

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

On 18.03.24 21:31, Kinsey Moore wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize I had tests turned off in my local build when I checked this. The test is now gated behind NEEDS_CLOCK_DRIVER as well. This is fine for fixing the build, but I would rather fix the tests. Applications may have there own clock drive

Re: [PATCH 3/5] xilinx-zynqmp-rpu: Remove URLs from copyrights

On 19.03.24 03:20, Chris Johns wrote: On 19/3/2024 3:30 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: --- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/abi.yml| 2 +- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/bspmercuryxu5.yml | 2 +- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/linkcmds.yml | 2 +- spec/buil

Re: [PATCH] bsps: Add BSP_FLUSH_KERNEL_CHAR_OUTPUT option

On 19.03.24 03:16, Chris Johns wrote: On 19/3/2024 3:49 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: Make the kernel I/O output character device flushing configurable. The bsp_reset() function should reset the unit and do nothing else. --- bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/console/console.c | 3 ++- bsps/aarch64/x

Re: [PATCH v2] user: Add docu for use of Rust with RTEMS

On 16/3/2024 1:14 am, Frank Kühndel wrote: > Ping! > > The last discussion of this patch was >    https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2024-February/077289.html > > Does the fact that I recive no further comments to this patch mean it can be > pushed to the RTEMS User Manual as it is? Sorry F

Re: RTEMS 7 GDB Build Failure on FreeBSD 13

On 19/3/2024 1:27 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I am going through the logs on the test sweep VMs to see why some builds are > failing. This is due to gdb's requirement for GMP and MPFR. What's the > recommended way to address this? Load native packages? No, we need to add support to build them. We h

Re: [PATCH 1/5] bsps: Use bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp

Does this patch series build at the per commit level? Chris On 19/3/2024 3:30 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > spec/build/bsps/dev/irq/optarmgic-icc-bpr0.yml| 6 +- > spec/build/bsps/dev/irq/optarmgic-icc-igrpen0.yml | 6 +- > spec/build/cpukit/optsmp.yml | 6 +

Re: [PATCH 3/5] xilinx-zynqmp-rpu: Remove URLs from copyrights

On 19/3/2024 3:30 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/abi.yml| 2 +- > spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/bspmercuryxu5.yml | 2 +- > spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/linkcmds.yml | 2 +- > spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/optpro

Re: [PATCH] bsps: Add BSP_FLUSH_KERNEL_CHAR_OUTPUT option

On 19/3/2024 3:49 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Make the kernel I/O output character device flushing configurable. The > bsp_reset() function should reset the unit and do nothing else. > --- > bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/console/console.c | 3 ++- > bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/include/bsp.h |

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

No. Just a lesson to remember -- Everyone along the path should have built rtems with all tests enabled. This is something that should never happen after the upcoming transition to GitLab. It definitely shows we need to build at least one BSP with tests enabled. On Mon, Mar 18, 2024, 7:45 PM zac

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

Do I need to do anything? On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 16:38, Kinsey Moore wrote: > Sorry, I didn't realize I had tests turned off in my local build when I > checked this. The test is now gated behind NEEDS_CLOCK_DRIVER as well. > > Kinsey > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:15 AM Sebastian Huber < > seba

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

Sorry, I didn't realize I had tests turned off in my local build when I checked this. The test is now gated behind NEEDS_CLOCK_DRIVER as well. Kinsey On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:15 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > This patch breaks the build: > > In file included f

Re: utf32 support

I think it would be wchar_t support in newlib. On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:56 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > What does support for UTF-32 entail? Do you have an idea what software > functions you are looking for? > > I see the International Components for Unicode (ICU) has a converter > (https://ic

Re: utf32 support

What does support for UTF-32 entail? Do you have an idea what software functions you are looking for? I see the International Components for Unicode (ICU) has a converter ( https://icu.unicode.org/download) which looks it might be part of a solution. Multibyte character methods defined by POSIX w

utf32 support

I want to add utf32 support. Where do I start? — John ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[PATCH] bsps: Add BSP_FLUSH_KERNEL_CHAR_OUTPUT option

Make the kernel I/O output character device flushing configurable. The bsp_reset() function should reset the unit and do nothing else. --- bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/console/console.c | 3 ++- bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/include/bsp.h | 2 -- .../console/console-config.c |

[PATCH] arm: Move _CPU_ISR_install_vector()

The use of this function is optional. Newer BSPs do not use it. --- .../score/cpu/arm/armv4-isr-install-vector.c | 75 +++ cpukit/score/cpu/arm/cpu.c| 28 +-- spec/build/cpukit/cpuarm.yml | 1 + 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 27 deleti

[PATCH 4/5] bsps: Add xilinx_zynq_rpu BSP variant

Add a BSP variant without a board-specific name. --- .../arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/bspmercuryxu5.yml | 87 +-- .../bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/bsprpu.yml | 17 spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/grp.yml | 69 +++ spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/obj.yml |

[PATCH 1/5] bsps: Use bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp

--- spec/build/bsps/dev/irq/optarmgic-icc-bpr0.yml| 6 +- spec/build/bsps/dev/irq/optarmgic-icc-igrpen0.yml | 6 +- spec/build/cpukit/optsmp.yml | 6 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/dev/irq/optarmgic-icc-bpr0.y

[PATCH 3/5] xilinx-zynqmp-rpu: Remove URLs from copyrights

--- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/abi.yml| 2 +- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/bspmercuryxu5.yml | 2 +- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/linkcmds.yml | 2 +- spec/build/bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu/optprocunitrpu.yml | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+),

[PATCH 5/5] bsps: Add xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_a53 BSP variant

Add a BSP variant without a board-specific name. --- .../bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/bspa53lp64.yml | 21 +++ .../bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/optloadoff.yml | 1 + .../bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/optramori.yml | 1 + spec/build/bsps/objxilinxsupportlp64.yml | 1 + spec/build/

[PATCH 2/5] bsps: Use bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu

--- spec/build/bsps/objxilinxsupportr5.yml | 3 +-- spec/build/bsps/optxilsupportpath.yml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/objxilinxsupportr5.yml b/spec/build/bsps/objxilinxsupportr5.yml index d800b83247..25221c5e0d 100644 --- a/spec/build/bs

RTEMS 7 GDB Build Failure on FreeBSD 13

Hi I am going through the logs on the test sweep VMs to see why some builds are failing. This is due to gdb's requirement for GMP and MPFR. What's the recommended way to address this? Load native packages? checking for the correct version of gmp.h... yes checking for the correct version of mpfr.h

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

This patch breaks the build: In file included from ../../../cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs.h:64, from ../../../testsuites/rhealstone/rhdeadlockbrk/deadlockbrk.c:215: ../../../cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/clock.h:74:4: error: #error "CONFIGURE_TICKS_PER_TIMESLICE shall be greate