[rtems-release PATCH] Update with RTEMS 6 changes

From: Chris Johns --- rtems-release-4.10-conf | 2 ++ rtems-release-4.11-conf | 2 ++ rtems-release-5-conf| 2 ++ rtems-release-defaults | 2 ++ rtems-release-kernel

[rtems-tools PATCH] tester/console: Fix restart regx check

From: Chris Johns The fix to the TFTP timeout has a simple bug. Updates #4959 --- tester/rt/config.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/config.py b/tester/rt/config.py index 139e1fa..2361bc9 100644 --- a/tester/rt/config.py +++ b/tester/rt/config.py @

Re: [PATCH] bsps/arm/stm32f4: Enable USART RX interrupts

Hi all, A quick bump, is anyone able to take a look at this? Best, Jacob On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, 9:00 PM Jacob Killelea wrote: > From: Jacob Killelea > > Hi all, this is my first email patch submission and my first contribution > to RTEMS, so please give any feedback you have! > > This patch ena

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:43 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 14/12/2023 6:32 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:> We use this file system on > lower > end controllers. > > I do not believe this is relevant to the discussion. The issue standard on > its > own merit and not yours or my uses. Can we please avoid

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On 14/12/2023 6:32 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:> We use this file system on lower end controllers. I do not believe this is relevant to the discussion. The issue standard on its own merit and not yours or my uses. Can we please avoid colouring discussion this way? Thanks. Chris

Re: [PATCH 1/2] libtest: Set test printer in rtems_test_run()

OK to both, thanks Chris On 14/12/2023 3:30 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Route the test output through T_vprintf(). > --- > cpukit/libtest/testrun.c | 14 +++--- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/libtest/testrun.c b/cpukit/libtest/testrun.c > ind

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:32 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 13.12.23 19:41, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:35 AM Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > On 13.12.23 15:27, Kinsey Moore wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On 13.12.23 19:41, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:35 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 13.12.23 15:27, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:26 AM Sebastian Huber > mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> >

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 8:35 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 13.12.23 15:27, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:26 AM Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > On 09.12.23 03:31, Kinsey Moore wrote: >

[PATCH 1/2] libtest: Set test printer in rtems_test_run()

Route the test output through T_vprintf(). --- cpukit/libtest/testrun.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libtest/testrun.c b/cpukit/libtest/testrun.c index 0d392e4581..1fc8c82824 100644 --- a/cpukit/libtest/testrun.c +++ b/cpukit/libtest/te

[PATCH 2/2] psxftw01: Simplify and use rtems_test_run()

--- testsuites/psxtests/psxftw01/init.c | 62 +++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxftw01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxftw01/init.c index 9d89c1e376..5bd89928d1 100644 --- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxftw01/init.c +++ b/

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On 13.12.23 15:27, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:26 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 09.12.23 03:31, Kinsey Moore wrote: > The inode cache can be altered and queried by multiple threads of > execution, even before the intro

Re: [PATCH 2/9] cpukit/jffs2: Protect the inode cache

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:26 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 09.12.23 03:31, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > The inode cache can be altered and queried by multiple threads of > > execution, even before the introduction of delayed write support for > > NAND. This provi

Re: [PATCH] rtems-fdt: Fix node property access on 64bit

Looks good to me. On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:48 PM wrote: > From: Chris Johns > > --- > cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c > b/cpukit/libmisc/rtems-fdt/rtems-fdt.c > index ec8f270eef.