Re: [PATCH] fixed warning related to spstdc17

2023-11-10 Thread zack leung
ping On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 22:07, zack leung wrote: > Sorry either I lack knowledge in C or lack knowledge in working with > rtems. Do you mean if rtems smp is defined then we make sure that scheduler > context base type is defined? I don't quite understand why it would be > !defined? And the c

[PATCH 1/1] sb/linux.py: More reliably recognize distribution

2023-11-10 Thread Michael South
If available, use "distro" package (introduced Python 3.6, back-ported to 2.6) to recognize Linux distributions and versions. Updates #4966 --- source-builder/sb/linux.py | 89 +- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/source-builder/

[PATCH 0/1] sb/linux.py: More reliably recognize distribution

2023-11-10 Thread Michael South
Fix #4966: SB doesn't recognize distros Python 3.8 If build host has Python >= 3.8 then Source builder could not very reliably determine paths for OS utilities such as bzip2. Problem was that "package.dist()", formerly used to determine the Linux distribution, was removed in Python 3.8. Patch ma

Re: [PATCH] build: Add RTEMS_QUALIFIED

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 09.11.23 06:28, Chris Johns wrote: On 8/11/2023 6:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06.11.23 21:55, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/11/2023 8:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06.11.23 01:14, Chris Johns wrote: On 4/11/2023 1:31 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 03.11.23 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: On

Re: [PATCH 1/1] trace: build with c++17 if building against llvm 16+

2023-11-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25.09.23 11:25, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 25.09.23 08:45, Chris Johns wrote: On 22/9/2023 2:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 22.09.23 04:36, Joel Sherrill wrote: Are we doing something that particularly requires C++17? AFAIK we haven't needed it yet and why wouldn't it also be needed with g