Re: [PATCH] build: Add RTEMS_QUALIFIED

2023-11-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 06.11.23 21:55, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/11/2023 8:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06.11.23 01:14, Chris Johns wrote: On 4/11/2023 1:31 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 03.11.23 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:58 AM Sebastian Huber mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.d

Re: [PATCH] build: Add RTEMS_QUALIFIED

2023-11-07 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 08.11.23 00:17, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 1:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: On 6/11/2023 8:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06.11.23 01:14, Chris Johns wrote: On 4/11/2023 1:31 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 03.11.23 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:58 AM Se

Re: [PATCH] build: Add RTEMS_QUALIFIED

2023-11-07 Thread Sam Price
I thought you would "verify" a package by looking at the symbols that end up included in the binary. And then have some sort of mapping between the symbols <> tests <> requirements. Any extra symbols not in the verification "database" would end up as a flag that a new test / requirement needs made

Re: [PATCH] build: Add RTEMS_QUALIFIED

2023-11-07 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 1:55 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 6/11/2023 8:27 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 06.11.23 01:14, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 4/11/2023 1:31 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>> On 03.11.23 15:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 3:58 AM Sebastian Huber >