Jeff Johnson pushed the patch to newlib. The github mirrored it after a
while. I bumped the hash in the RSB.
This should be ok now.
How often does the github mirroring of gcc, newlib, etc run?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 3:53 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I'm not sure what triggers the newlib mirror t
Looks good. Please push.
Thanks
Chris
On 27/9/2022 10:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
> b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-g
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
index fe4f827..c8eb0a6 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib
On 27/9/2022 10:30 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
> b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
> index fe4f827..7
---
rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg
index fe4f827..76dc221 100644
--- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib
I'm not sure what triggers the newlib mirror to update on github. When it's
up to date, I'm ready to update rteems-source-builder.
Sebastian.. what's the trigger?
--joel
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 1:08 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 1:51 PM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.hu...
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022, 7:43 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this. It is exciting to see this board being supported. Well
> done
> getting to a point we can review the changess. My comments are mostly
> about the
> commit message :)
>
> Is the BSP called `aarch64/raspberrypi4b`? I just w
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 1:51 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 26/09/2022 18:58, Markus Moessner wrote:
> >>> The second one is triggered by the function getrusage in
> rtemsbsd/include/bsd/sys/ressource.h.
> >>> There is a another declaration in include/sys/ressou
Hi Noor,
I successfully applied this patch, built and ran a couple of samples on my
RPI4b. I ran unlimited and ticker. I'm going to try one of my applications
later today or tomorrow.
The build has one warning:
../../../bsps/aarch64/raspberrypi/start/bspstarthooks.c: In function
'bsp_start_hook_1':
On 26/09/2022 18:58, Markus Moessner wrote:
The second one is triggered by the function getrusage in
rtemsbsd/include/bsd/sys/ressource.h.
There is a another declaration in include/sys/ressource.h provided with the
toolchain.
Now, one has C Linkage the other one C++ Linkage which leads to a con
Am 26.09.2022 um 18:58 schrieb Markus Moessner:
The second one is triggered by the function getrusage in
rtemsbsd/include/bsd/sys/ressource.h.
There is a another declaration in include/sys/ressource.h provided with the
toolchain.
Now, one has C Linkage the other one C++ Linkage which leads t
From: "Markus B. Moessner"
Dear all, I am using the latest RTEMS 6 tools and sources. When building a C++
application including libbsd I receive an error from GCC.
GCC complains about the macro BITSET_DEFINE within
freebsd/sys/sys/_domainset.h. I think this relates to a patch "sys/bitset.h:
re
From: kaidoho
---
freebsd/sys/sys/_domainset.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/freebsd/sys/sys/_domainset.h b/freebsd/sys/sys/_domainset.h
index 5685d532..443c68fd 100644
--- a/freebsd/sys/sys/_domainset.h
+++ b/freebsd/sys/sys/_domainset.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
>>
>> The second one is triggered by the function getrusage in
>> rtemsbsd/include/bsd/sys/ressource.h.
>> There is a another declaration in include/sys/ressource.h provided with the
>> toolchain.
>> Now, one has C Linkage the other one C++ Linkage which leads to a conflict.
>> I ve simply mad
Hello Luís,
On 26/09/2022 16:29, Luis Alves wrote:
It makes a lot of sense to us and ESA to have this new
rtems_timer_server_construct directive availableto the space industry,
thus avoiding the custom stack allocator, which adds inefficiency to the
development process and might be more prone
Thank you for the quick reply.
We agree that it is in fact inconvenient for each user having to provide a
custom stack allocator in order to be able to use the Timer Server feature.
It makes a lot of sense to us and ESA to have this new
rtems_timer_server_construct directive available to the spac
I expect you noticed but there were a lot of tool build failures over the
past few days reported.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 2:05 AM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 26/9/2022 4:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 26/09/2022 08:43, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> On 26/9/2022 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>> On
On 26/9/2022 5:10 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this. Looks good. I few minor issues.
>
> Should memory sizes be discussed given there are a few models with different
> sized memory?
>
> Can the subject please be:
>
> user/raspberrypi4.rst: Added the AArch64 Raspberry pi 4B BSP
Hi,
Thanks for this. Looks good. I few minor issues.
Should memory sizes be discussed given there are a few models with different
sized memory?
Can the subject please be:
user/raspberrypi4.rst: Added the AArch64 Raspberry pi 4B BSP
Minor nit has the end of the email ...
On 26/9/2022 4:52 pm,
On 26/9/2022 4:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 26/09/2022 08:43, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 26/9/2022 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 09/09/2022 00:47, Chris Johns wrote:
On 9/9/2022 12:28 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
https://codeload.github.com/RTEMS/sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb/
20 matches
Mail list logo
