This section was added recently and must be mapped to be accessed
without generating an exception.
---
bsps/aarch64/include/bsp/aarch64-mmu.h| 4
bsps/aarch64/include/bsp/linker-symbols.h | 4
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/aarch64/include/bsp/aarch64-mmu.h
b/bs
Disregard this patch, I see Sebastian has already committed a different fix to
the test itself.
Kinsey
-Original Message-
From: Kinsey Moore
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 14:54
To: devel@rtems.org
Cc: Kinsey Moore
Subject: [PATCH] score: Restore previous behavior for system state
Set s
Set system state before creating the idle threads. This fixes the
spextensions01 test since it expects this behavior.
---
cpukit/score/src/threadcreateidle.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/threadcreateidle.c
b/cpukit/score/src/threadcreateid
---
cpukit/dev/can/can-queue.c| 112 +++
cpukit/dev/can/can.c | 480 ++
cpukit/include/dev/can/can.h | 115 +++
spec/build/cpukit/librtemscpu.yml | 5 +
4 files changed, 712 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 cpukit/dev/can/can-queue.c
This is a review request for the CAN patch with tx and minimal rx support.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 7/6/2022 13:21, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06/07/2022 20:19, Gedare Bloom wrote:
ok, this changes slightly the order of events in the system state
(idle threads are now created in the preceding state,
SYSTEM_STATE_BEFORE_INITIALIZATION) but without thinking too hard
about it, I think it should
Hi Christian,
I created a patch (attached in the mail) for review, which has CAN support.
Shall I send the patch for review to @rtems-de...@rtems.org
?
Regards
Prashanth S
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 10:03, Prashanth S wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> This is to update the status.
>
> Yesterday, pushed
This change seems to have made the test intermittently failing on
AArch64 under QEMU:
*** BEGIN OF TEST SPPPS 1 ***
*** TEST VERSION: 6.0.0.4142fd12385473426b461560b76cee6e903dc2cd
*** TEST STATE: EXPECTED_PASS
*** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_POSIX_API RTEMS_SMP
*** TEST TOOLS: 12.1.1 20220622 (RTEMS 6, R
Hello,
This didn't pass through the mailing list due to large files, so I am
resending it. I have uploaded the sample generated files to Google Drive
and included the links here instead of attaching them directly. If you have
accessibility issues, please let me know.
RTEMS 4.11.3 release notes PD
On 14.07.22 16:03, Daniel Cederman wrote:
diff --git a/bsps/riscv/shared/start/start.S b/bsps/riscv/shared/start/start.S
index 3702f8ac2f..21945a99f5 100644
--- a/bsps/riscv/shared/start/start.S
+++ b/bsps/riscv/shared/start/start.S
@@ -35,6 +35,16 @@
#include
#include
+#if __riscv_xlen
On 14.07.22 16:03, Daniel Cederman wrote:
+/*
+ * This variable is initialized by the first CPU entering the BSP start code.
+ * The value is the stack pointer at entry.
+ */
+extern uintptr_t riscv_start_stack_pointer;
Since C code should not modify this, maybe declare it as const.
--
embedde
On 14.07.22 16:03, Daniel Cederman wrote:
diff --git a/spec/build/bsps/riscv/noel/optconirq.yml
b/spec/build/bsps/riscv/noel/optconirq.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00..d836822efb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/build/bsps/riscv/noel/optconirq.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+SPDX-License-Identifier: C
The uniprocessor schedulers had some special case logic for the
PRIORITY_PSEUDO_ISR priority. Tasks with a priority of PRIORITY_PSEUDO_ISR
were allowed to preempt a not preemptible task. If other higher priority task
are made ready while a PRIORITY_PSEUDO_ISR task preempts a not preemptible
task,
13 matches
Mail list logo