Re: STM32H7 BSP tree refactoring proposal.

Hello Karel, On 07/04/2022 13:07, Karel Gardas wrote: Hello Sebastian, I'd like to propose following STM32H7 BSP tree refactoring: - move BSP's board dependent bits into boards//name> directory - get rid of very complex (merged for 3 boards already) start/system_stm32h7xx.c file - get ri

Re: CAN driver message structure

Hi Prashanth, not sure about others but Pavel Pisa is CAN expert here. CCing him directly as I've not seen him active recently. Anyway, as a non-expert I'd like to offer my hopefully not that misleading point of view. If you are going to write CAN driver, then you first need to interface

libc functions from c++ issues

Hi, The following code: // aarch64-rtems6-g++ -std=c++98 -c test.o test.cpp // aarch64-rtems6-g++ -std=c++03 -c test.o test.cpp // aarch64-rtems6-g++ -std=c++11 -c test.o test.cpp // aarch64-rtems6-g++ -std=c++17 -c test.o test.cpp #include #include void t1(pthread_t thread) { ::setenv("ABC",

Re: AW: [PATCH 12/12] spec/build/cpukit: Add option for enabling PPS synchronization

On 8/4/2022 3:48 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/04/2022 02:45, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 7/4/2022 9:56 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> We should avoid new CPU options in general. >> Is this documented with a suitable rational? > > This could be something for: > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches

Re: [PATCH 0/1] libbsd: Add TFTP filesystem to test media01

Hi Frank, I am OK with this change. Thanks Chris On 9/4/2022 12:05 am, Frank Kuehndel wrote: > From: Frank Kühndel > > Hello, > > I would like to ask the community whether it would be possible > to accept the little patch which follows? The patch permits to > mount and use the TFTP filesyste

CAN driver message structure

Hi All, This is to query on CAN message format for CAN drivers. I want to implement a CAN driver for BeagleBone Black in RTEMS(GSoC). As I looked through the RTEMS Source Tree, found https://devel.rtems.org/browser/rtems/bsps/arm/lpc176x/can

Re: List third party files in cpukit and testsuites

On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:46 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:35 PM Ryan Long wrote: > > > > This is the set of files in the source code that are all third party. > > This means they should not be re-licensed or re-formatted. > > > > If anything on this list is wrong, or if I m

Re: List third party files in cpukit and testsuites

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 12:35 PM Ryan Long wrote: > > This is the set of files in the source code that are all third party. > This means they should not be re-licensed or re-formatted. > > If anything on this list is wrong, or if I missed some, please comment. > > Thanks, > > Ryan > > David Gibson,