On 20/1/22 9:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:56 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 20/1/22 5:08 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> Are the Tier 1 architectures/BSPs documented anywhere besides an INI file?
>>
>> I do not think they are.
>
> Me either. I vaguely recall we have had th
On 20/1/22 2:54 pm, Alex White wrote:
> From: Jennifer Averett
> rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-vmem.c| 17 +
> diff --git a/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-vmem.c
> b/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-vmem.c
> index f64fbd17..70708902 100644
> --- a/rtemsbsd/rtems/rtems-kernel-vmem.c
> +++ b/rt
On 20/01/2022 04:54, Alex White wrote:
diff --git a/freebsd/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c b/freebsd/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
index fc111d9c..60f9123a 100644
--- a/freebsd/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
+++ b/freebsd/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
@@ -721,6 +721,15 @@ tcp_input(struct mbuf **mp, int *offp, int proto)
On 20/01/2022 04:54, Alex White wrote:
This patch set adds support for Xilinx's AXI Ethernet IP core. It has
been tested both in QEMU and on the KCU105 board using the default
FPGA implementation from the Xilinx's KCU105 PetaLinux BSP.
Alex White (1):
microblaze: Finish AXI Ethernet support
From: Jennifer Averett
---
buildset/default.ini |1 +
freebsd/sys/dev/mii/tiphy.h | 57 +
freebsd/sys/dev/xdma/xdma.c | 501
freebsd/sys/dev/xdma/xdma.h | 285 +
freebsd/sys/dev/xdma/xdma_bank.c
---
freebsd/sys/dev/xdma/xdma_sg.c | 3 ++-
freebsd/sys/dev/xilinx/axidma.c| 14 --
freebsd/sys/dev/xilinx/if_xae.c| 4 ++--
freebsd/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c| 9 +
freebsd/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c
This patch set adds support for Xilinx's AXI Ethernet IP core. It has
been tested both in QEMU and on the KCU105 board using the default
FPGA implementation from the Xilinx's KCU105 PetaLinux BSP.
Alex White (1):
microblaze: Finish AXI Ethernet support
Jennifer Averett (1):
microblaze: Add A
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 2:56 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 20/1/22 5:08 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Are the Tier 1 architectures/BSPs documented anywhere besides an INI file?
>
> I do not think they are.
Me either. I vaguely recall we have had this conversation before.
Where should they be? Seba
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 3:00 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 8/1/22 9:34 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 4:17 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/1/22 8:28 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Our MacOS VM is failing to build several of the tools on the RTEMS 5
> >>> bran
On 8/1/22 9:34 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 4:17 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 8/1/22 8:28 am, Ryan Long wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Our MacOS VM is failing to build several of the tools on the RTEMS 5
>>> branch. We
>>> think that using an older version of gcc should get all of
Looks great and thank you for taking care of this.
Chris
On 20/1/22 5:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> The set of ini files for rtems-bsp-builder was out of sync
> with the set of architectures and BSPs currently in RTEMS.
> This patch set adds three architectures and a handful of BSPs.
>
> Build r
On 20/1/22 5:08 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Are the Tier 1 architectures/BSPs documented anywhere besides an INI file?
I do not think they are.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Are the Tier 1 architectures/BSPs documented anywhere besides an INI file?
--joel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:49 AM Kinsey Moore wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/2022 09:41, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> >
> > On 1/19/2022 09:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> On 19/01/2022 15:42, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> >>> On 1/18/2022
---
config/rtems-bsps-x86_64.ini | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 config/rtems-bsps-x86_64.ini
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-x86_64.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-x86_64.ini
new file mode 100644
index 000..eeccfea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/config/rtems-
---
config/rtems-bsps-microblaze.ini | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 config/rtems-bsps-microblaze.ini
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-microblaze.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-microblaze.ini
new file mode 100644
index 000..b886dbd
--- /dev/null
+++
frdme310arty,
griscv, grv32i, grv32im, grv32imac, grv32imafdc,
rv32iac, rv32i, rv32imac, rv32imafc, rv32imafdc, rv32imafd, rv32im
---
config/rtems-bsps-riscv.ini | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-riscv.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-riscv
---
config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini | 31 +++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-aarch64.ini
new file mode 100644
index 000..110ab17
--- /dev/null
+++ b/con
The set of ini files for rtems-bsp-builder was out of sync
with the set of architectures and BSPs currently in RTEMS.
This patch set adds three architectures and a handful of BSPs.
Build results with these patches are at:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2022-January/031032.html
--joel
J
fvp_cortex_r52, imxrt1052, nucleo-h743zi, stm32h7, xen_virtual,
xilinx_zynqmp_ultra96
---
config/rtems-bsps-arm.ini | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config/rtems-bsps-arm.ini b/config/rtems-bsps-arm.ini
index 02b54e7..b9a940d 100644
---
On 1/19/2022 09:41, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On 1/19/2022 09:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 19/01/2022 15:42, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On 1/18/2022 10:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 18/01/2022 17:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
Closes #4581
It wo
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 8:25 PM zack leung wrote:
>
> I think that the malloc tests is calculated differently than alloc_size+
> allocsize mod it looks like this
> *alloc_size = (uintptr_t) next_block + HEAP_ALLOC_BONUS - alloc_begin;
> when i run the comparison i get 8 (with heap alignment) an
On 19/01/2022 16:41, Kinsey Moore wrote:
ts-performance-no-clock-0 gets test-too-long, but passes with
modified tester timeouts and all the other validation tests pass just
fine.
Great, did the ts-validation-intr test run also? It fails on my Qemu
simulator.
Yes, that test was included in
On 1/19/2022 09:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 19/01/2022 15:42, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On 1/18/2022 10:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 18/01/2022 17:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
Closes #4581
It would be nice if you could run also the new
On 19/01/2022 15:42, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On 1/18/2022 10:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 18/01/2022 17:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
Closes #4581
It would be nice if you could run also the new validation tests on
this branch:
https://gi
On 1/18/2022 10:23, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 18/01/2022 17:19, Kinsey Moore wrote:
Hardware test results have recently been posted for AArch64.
Closes #4581
It would be nice if you could run also the new validation tests on
this branch:
https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=validati
25 matches
Mail list logo
