On 3/12/21 11:50 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> RTEMS untar implementation had problems with overwriting or integrating
> archives into existing directory structures. This patch adapts the
> behavior to mimic that of a GNU tar or BSD tar and extends the tar01
> test to check for the behavior. That
On 4/12/21 1:47 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For this series of patches, I followed this series of steps:
>
> 1. Convert a file from the C way of doing things to C++.
> 2. Go through all the files that had to do with the converted file and
> make the formatting consistent.
OK to push.
It woul
On 3/12/21 8:26 pm, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Johns
>> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 10:11 PM
>> To: Sommer, Jan ; Moyano Heredia, Victor Gabriel
>> ; devel@rtems.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Update rtems-notes-5.md
>>
>> On 2/12/21 7:27 pm, jan.so
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:11 AM Christian MAUDERER
wrote:
>
> Hello Joel,
>
> thanks for the review. I'll apply it on master in the next few days.
>
> The behavior that our untar can't overwrite directories is in 5 too. The
> behavior on 5 changed last with the patches from ticket #3823 in
> 2019-1
Hello Joel,
thanks for the review. I'll apply it on master in the next few days.
The behavior that our untar can't overwrite directories is in 5 too. The
behavior on 5 changed last with the patches from ticket #3823 in
2019-11. I would lean to creating a ticket for 5 and apply the patch
there
Bumped dtc version to get rid of build failure for dtc.
Closes #4562
---
bare/config/devel/dtc-1.6.1-1.cfg | 18 ++
bare/config/devel/dtc.bset| 2 +-
rtems/config/5/rtems-moxie.bset | 2 +-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 bare/conf