Re: RSB Failure

It looks like there weren't any issues. The return code was 0. On 11/30/2021 2:47 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: On 11/30/21 5:07 PM, Ryan Long wrote: I forgot to mention that I'm using Ubuntu21.04. It has the ca-certificates package installed. Is there maybe another package that it might need? This w

Re: [rtems-tools] tester: Update jobs configuration

ping On 11/15/2021 4:39 PM, Ryan Long wrote: ping On 11/1/2021 5:31 PM, Ryan Long wrote: ping -Original Message- From: Ryan Long Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 3:06 PM To: devel@rtems.org Cc: Ryan Long Subject: [rtems-tools] tester: Update jobs configuration Allow for default_jo

Re: RSB Failure

On 11/30/21 5:07 PM, Ryan Long wrote: > I forgot to mention that I'm using Ubuntu21.04. It has the > ca-certificates package installed. Is there maybe another package that > it might need? This worked fine when I did a run with RTEMS 6. What does: openssl s_client -connect git.rtems.org:443 run

Re: RSB Failure

I forgot to mention that I'm using Ubuntu21.04. It has the ca-certificates package installed. Is there maybe another package that it might need? This worked fine when I did a run with RTEMS 6. On 11/30/2021 9:26 AM, Karel Gardas wrote: I think you are right about certs issue: download: no ssl

Re: RSB Failure

I think you are right about certs issue: download: no ssl context suggest the same probably. But, it looks like everything is fine on the server side: $ openssl s_client -connect git.rtems.org:443 CONNECTED(0003) depth=2 C = US, O = Internet Security Research Group, CN = ISRG Root X1 verif

[PATCH 0/1] Update release notes of rtems 5

The ticket #4549 for adding NTP support in rtems 5 was closed. With this patch, the release notes file for rtems 5 is updated. Moyano, Gabriel (1): Update rtems-notes-5.md rtems-notes-5.md | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) -- 2.17.1 _

[PATCH 1/1] Update rtems-notes-5.md

--- rtems-notes-5.md | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/rtems-notes-5.md b/rtems-notes-5.md index 3737199..7697980 100644 --- a/rtems-notes-5.md +++ b/rtems-notes-5.md @@ -374,3 +374,12 @@ Obsoleted architectures: * RTEMS Trace addition of a new trace record support for

RSB Failure

Hi, I'm trying to do a forced build of all of the tools and BSPs for RTEMS 5, but I'm getting this error. script: 86: source_dir_rtems_tools=${rtems_tools_source} source setup: rtems-tools-0a5d2057749066e7d184836e92c7ce5334fccc90-1: source rtems-tools -q -n ${rtems_tools_source} making dir:

Re: [PATCH 2/5] score: Split wkspace.c

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:53 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 30/11/2021 14:49, Joel Sherrill wrote> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 4:29 AM > Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > Splitting the file avoids unnecessary link-time dependencies. > > > > > > How?

Re: [PATCH 2/5] score: Split wkspace.c

On 30/11/2021 14:49, Joel Sherrill wrote> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 4:29 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: Splitting the file avoids unnecessary link-time dependencies. How? What were they? All bsps compile and link with the per item options so what trippe

Re: [PATCH 1/5] wkspace.c: Change license to BSD-2-Clause

Ok On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 4:29 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Change licence according to file history. > > Update #3053. > --- > cpukit/score/src/wkspace.c | 29 - > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/c

Re: [PATCH 2/5] score: Split wkspace.c

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 4:29 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Splitting the file avoids unnecessary link-time dependencies. > How? What were they? All bsps compile and link with the per item options so what tripped the dependency? Adding that to the log message woul

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Optimize workspace/malloc initialization

Hello Karel, On 30/11/2021 12:04, Karel Gardas wrote: just a question. Do you plan to preserve functionality of _Heap_Extend() in the future? this feature is still available. However, there was a significant change in the handling of BSP-provided memory areas between RTEMS 5 and 6. Asking

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Optimize workspace/malloc initialization

Hi Sebastian, just a question. Do you plan to preserve functionality of _Heap_Extend() in the future? Asking since I'm using it for amd64/uefi bsp. During the bsp start I get efi services pointers and use that to traverse memory map. Based on available free blocks I try to allocate memory using