Re: Ticket 4429

bump On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 23:47, zack leung wrote: > bump > > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 00:30, zack leung wrote: > >> For relative times, the clock identifier is not used to select the clock >> and instead always the CLOCK_MONOTONIC is used. A side-effect is that >> sleep() and nanosleep() use

Re: Ticket 4503

bump On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 23:58, zack leung wrote: > bump > > > On Sat, 25 Sept 2021 at 00:26, zack leung > wrote: > >> bump >> >> On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 02:17, zack leung >> wrote: >> >>> >Thanks! I guess i'm really unsure about how the pointer relates to the >>> amount of memory that you c

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Use identifier instead of designator

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:05 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 18/11/2021 20:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > OK but do these terms need to be defined somewhere in the RTEMS > > documentation set? > > Hm, you mean it could be confusing since we already have "object > identifiers". Maybe this was the re

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Use identifier instead of designator

On 18/11/2021 20:01, Joel Sherrill wrote: OK but do these terms need to be defined somewhere in the RTEMS documentation set? Hm, you mean it could be confusing since we already have "object identifiers". Maybe this was the reason why I used "designator". I guess we should drop this patch. -

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Use identifier instead of designator

OK but do these terms need to be defined somewhere in the RTEMS documentation set? --joel On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:58 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > The term identifier is better aligned with the C11 standard wording. > --- > cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h | 24 > 1

[PATCH] rtems: Use identifier instead of designator

The term identifier is better aligned with the C11 standard wording. --- cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h | 24 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/intr.h index d0aaed5f30..2c88d12

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Use RTEMS_WHO_AM_I for rtems_task_ident()

On 18/11/2021 19:42, Joel Sherrill wrote: Plus the minor patch to the documentation. The header file and the directive documentation is generated from the same specification item. -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puchheim Germany email: sebastian.hu...@embedde

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Use RTEMS_WHO_AM_I for rtems_task_ident()

This should be OK to push. Plus the minor patch to the documentation. --joel On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:55 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > --- > cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/tasks.h| 3 ++- > cpukit/rtems/src/taskident.c | 3 ++- > testsuites/libtests/malloctest/task1.c| 2 +

Re: [PATCH] rtems: Add bindings for languages other than C/C++

Being picky, this doesn't add bindings. It adds real bodies so other languages have something to bind to. This is certainly needed for Ada and there would need to be Ada code to implement the bindings. Patch is ok otherwise --joel On Thu, Nov 18, 2021, 9:55 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@e

[PATCH] rtems: Add bindings for languages other than C/C++

Add bindings for languages other than C/C++ for rtems_scheduler_get_processor() and rtems_scheduler_get_processor_maximum(). --- cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessor.c| 54 + cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessormax.c | 54 + spec/build/cpukit/librtem

[PATCH] rtems: Use RTEMS_WHO_AM_I for rtems_task_ident()

--- cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/tasks.h| 3 ++- cpukit/rtems/src/taskident.c | 3 ++- testsuites/libtests/malloctest/task1.c| 2 +- testsuites/libtests/stackchk/task1.c | 2 +- testsuites/mptests/mp01/task1.c | 2 +- testsuites/mptests/mp03/task1.c