Re: [PATCH v2] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/10/2021 01:35, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns Closes #4533 --- spec/build/cpukit/cpuopts.yml | 2 ++ spec/build/cpukit/libdebugger.yml | 2 +- spec/build/cpukit/optlibdebugger.yml | 16 spec/build/testsuites/libtests/d

[PATCH v2] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread chrisj
From: Chris Johns Closes #4533 --- spec/build/cpukit/cpuopts.yml | 2 ++ spec/build/cpukit/libdebugger.yml | 2 +- spec/build/cpukit/optlibdebugger.yml | 16 spec/build/testsuites/libtests/debugger01.yml | 4 +--- 4 files changed, 20 inser

Re: [PATCH] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 22/10/21 1:21 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/10/2021 10:36, Chris Johns wrote: >> Could you please answer the other parts of the email you cut because it would >> help understand this stuff? >> >> Specifically the opt* and user options. When is an option optional and when >> is >> an option

Re: commit hash of rtems-libbsd

2021-10-21 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021, 2:22 AM wrote: > Hi everyone, > > is there any macro defined while compiling rtems-libbsd with the commit > hash of the current commit? > Not as far as I know. If you cloned it, there is always git log. There is an RTEMS version method for RTEMS itself. I don't think there

Re: [PATCH] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 21/10/2021 10:36, Chris Johns wrote: Could you please answer the other parts of the email you cut because it would help understand this stuff? Specifically the opt* and user options. When is an option optional and when is an option an option but not optional? The option item files are used

Re: [PATCH] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
Could you please answer the other parts of the email you cut because it would help understand this stuff? Specifically the opt* and user options. When is an option optional and when is an option an option but not optional? On 21/10/21 7:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/10/2021 10:06, Chris J

Re: [PATCH] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 21/10/2021 10:06, Chris Johns wrote: KeyError: '/cpukit/optlibddebugger' You have to admit this is a horrible error message. It provides no insight into problem or the solution. Looks like a typo. Maybe use optlibdebugger? -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Pu

Re: [PATCH] spec/libdebugger: Only enable for supported architectures

2021-10-21 Thread Chris Johns
On 21/10/21 4:59 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/10/2021 07:45, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 21/10/21 4:30 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 21/10/2021 04:09, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns ---    spec/build/cpukit/libdebugger.yml | 5 -    spec/bui

commit hash of rtems-libbsd

2021-10-21 Thread Gabriel.Moyano
Hi everyone, is there any macro defined while compiling rtems-libbsd with the commit hash of the current commit? Thx! Gabriel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel