On 24/9/21 7:26 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> -bool ReadUntilFound( FILE *file, const char *line )
> +bool ReadUntilFound( std::ifstream& file, const char* line )
> {
> - char discardBuff[100];
> - size_t len = strlen( line );
> + #define BUFFER_LENGTH
There is no value?
> + char discardBuff[BUF
On 24/9/21 7:27 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> ---
> tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc | 47
> +---
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc
> b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc
> index d14260f..1f0e719 1
On 24/9/21 7:26 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> ---
> tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc | 21 +++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
> b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
> index 7f72168..b1c52a9 100644
> --- a/te
---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterBase.h | 3 ++-
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc | 43 +---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterBase.h b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterBase.
---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h
index aa89860..7078837 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h
+++ b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @
---
tester/covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.cc | 4 +-
tester/covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.h| 2 +-
tester/covoar/TargetBase.cc | 6 +-
tester/covoar/TargetBase.h | 4 +-
tester/covoar/TraceReaderBase.h | 4 +-
tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc | 123 --
---
tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.cc | 13 +
tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.h | 13 +++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.cc b/tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.cc
index 159c556..cfd58df 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/CoverageR
---
tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
index 59b5d23..636df3a 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
+++ b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ names
---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc | 47 +---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc
index d14260f..1f0e719 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc
+++ b/tester/
---
tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc | 21 +++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
index 7f72168..b1c52a9 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
+++ b/tester/covoar
Hi,
For this series of patches, I
- initialized an uninitialized array
- added check for length of "line" parameter
- simplified a conditional
Thanks,
Ryan
Ryan Long (7):
CoverageRanges.cc: Fix formatting
TraceReader: Convert to C++
TraceWriter: Convert to C++
TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc: Fix
Context validation for AArch64 was ported from the ARM implementation
without a reinterpretation of the actual requirements. The spcontext01
test just happened to pass because the set of scratch registers in ARM
is a subset of the scratch registers in AArch64.
---
.../cpu/aarch64/aarch64-context-v
Both of those definitions of discardBuff do the same thing. The form of value
initializing in the example I showed was introduced in C++11. It was put in to
zero out templated objects evidently. I just saw it on stackoverflow. :)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johns
Sent: Wednesday, Se
On 23/9/21 7:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 10:44, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 23/9/21 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 23/09/2021 07:43,chr...@rtems.orgĀ wrote:
From: Chris Johns
- This call is provided by RTEMS and that is preferred
Closes #4518
>>> This
On 23/09/2021 10:44, Chris Johns wrote:
On 23/9/21 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 23/09/2021 07:43,chr...@rtems.org wrote:
From: Chris Johns
- This call is provided by RTEMS and that is preferred
Closes #4518
This removes the kqueue() support for pipe().
It does but it also lets the RT
On 23/9/21 4:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 23/09/2021 07:43, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
>> From: Chris Johns
>>
>> - This call is provided by RTEMS and that is preferred
>>
>> Closes #4518
>
> This removes the kqueue() support for pipe().
It does but it also lets the RTEMS one get linked in and
16 matches
Mail list logo