Re: Ticket 4503

>Thanks! I guess i'm really unsure about how the pointer relates to the amount of memory that you can use. I assume the Malloc keeps track of the sections being used in the heap. Does this function Allocate 2 blocks since the pointer is set to (uintptr_t) next_block + HEAP_ALLOC_BONUS - alloc_begi

Re: [PATCH] improve the format of error reporting on i386

Thread ID is now a hex value part of ticket #4203 On Wed, 8 Sept 2021 at 23:58, Zacchaeus Leung wrote: > diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c > index 77b7a7161c..06af57418d 100644 > --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c > +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c > @@ -21

[PATCH] improve the format of error reporting on i386

diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c index 77b7a7161c..06af57418d 100644 --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c +++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void _CPU_Exception_frame_print (const CPU_Exception_frame *ctx) { unsigned int faultAddr = 0; p

Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] cpukit/aarch64: Add Exception Manager support

On 2/9/21 3:36 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > On 9/1/2021 10:58, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 01/09/2021 17:48, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> So, my proposal would be something like this: >>> >>> 1. Processor jumps to exception prologue >>> >>> 2. Exception prologue saves the context to CPU exception fra

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools v1 05/10] CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc: Fix formatting

On 9/9/21 2:44 am, Ryan Long wrote: > --- > tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc | 23 +++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc > b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc > index 3332cd4..d6c6ca3 100644 > ---

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools v1 02/10] covoar.cc: Convert to C++

On 9/9/21 2:44 am, Ryan Long wrote: > Got rid of C-strings, changed FILE pointer to ifstream. > --- > tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 52 > +++-- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc b/tester/covoar/

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools v1 01/10] CoverageWriter: Convert to C++

On 9/9/21 2:44 am, Ryan Long wrote: > --- > tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h| 4 +++- > tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc | 26 +++--- > tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.h | 4 +++- > tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc | 33 ++---

Re: [PATCH] tester/zynqmp: Simpify the reasons to reset

On 8/9/21 11:09 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote: > Comment below. > > On 9/6/2021 23:38, chr...@rtems.org wrote: >> From: Chris Johns >> >> - Only reset if the bootloader error is hardware related. >> --- >>   tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xilinx_zynqmp_ilp32_zu3eg.ini | 2 +- >>   tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xi

Re: Ticket 4503

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:02 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hi Zack, > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4503 > > The malloc implementation exists in the score as the Heap Manager. search > for "Heap_" within cpukit to get some ideas where to look. > I think the method is _Heap_Size_of_alloc_area. It m

Re: [PATCH v2] STM32 lwIP addition and CMake support

Hi, Robin, Would it be possible to retain the STM32 code, but carve out the “contaminated” lwIP code into a patch file. Then RTEMS code base remains “clean” and if I, any user, chose to enable lwIP on STM32, I could do so by applying that patch. I’d contaminate my src tree, but that’d be my r

Re: [PATCH v2] STM32 lwIP addition and CMake support

Hi, Unfortunately, there was no other reply to the request. Easiest solution would be to exclude the STM32 code completely out of RTEMS code for now. I can host it as example code in a personal repository. But then I might have to change the architecture of the lwIP code again which provided some

[PATCH] rtems: Generate

Change license to BSD-2-Clause according to file histories and documentation re-licensing agreement. Update #3899. Update #3993. --- cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/cache.h | 688 ++--- 1 file changed, 532 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/rtems

Re: Dies libbsd DHCP provide a private network address?

On 08/09/2021 19:04, Peter Dufault wrote: I've been looking into this but I don't see anywhere where a link-level private address might be assigned. At one of my clients the RTEMS client (client overload!, my client, DHCP client) gets a link-level private address e.g. 169.254.208.184. They in

Dies libbsd DHCP provide a private network address?

I've been looking into this but I don't see anywhere where a link-level private address might be assigned. At one of my clients the RTEMS client (client overload!, my client, DHCP client) gets a link-level private address e.g. 169.254.208.184. They insist that "libbsd" must be providing this a

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 10/10] CoverageWriterTSIM.h: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.h b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.h index 5ae57f8..9325a6a 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.h +++ b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.h

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 09/10] CoverageWriterTSIM.cc: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.cc | 23 --- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.cc b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.cc index bd15c9d..6c11b2b 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterTSIM.cc +++ b/tester/covo

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 08/10] CoverageWriterSkyeye.h: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.h b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.h index 8f11959..5ef6432 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.h +++ b/tester/covoar/CoverageWrite

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 07/10] CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc index 5225406..08aa609 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc +++ b/tester

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 06/10] CoverageWriterRTEMS.h: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.h b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.h index c760936..9110303 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.h +++ b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTE

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 05/10] CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc | 23 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc index 3332cd4..d6c6ca3 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc +++ b/tester/

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 04/10] covoar.cc: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 300 +++- 1 file changed, 167 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc index 746add1..e8fb430 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc +++ b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc @@ -35,2

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 03/10] CoverageWriterBase.h: Fix formatting

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h index fca501a..ee8c148 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h +++ b/tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 01/10] CoverageWriter: Convert to C++

--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterBase.h| 4 +++- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.cc | 26 +++--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterRTEMS.h | 4 +++- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.cc | 33 ++--- tester/covoar/CoverageWriterSkyeye.h | 4 +++-

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 02/10] covoar.cc: Convert to C++

Got rid of C-strings, changed FILE pointer to ifstream. --- tester/covoar/covoar.cc | 52 +++-- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/covoar.cc b/tester/covoar/covoar.cc index f9d4814..746add1 100644 --- a/tester/c

[PATCH rtems-tools v1 00/10] Convert and reformat pt. 2

Hi, For this series of patches, I followed this series of steps: 1. Convert a file from the C way of doing things to C++ 2. Go through all the files that had to do with the converted file and make the formatting consistent. Thanks, Ryan Ryan Long (10): CoverageWriter: Convert to C++ covoar.

RE: [PATCH RSB] rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg: Add newlib patch

I’ve just changed the optimization flags for rtems-tools, but I think I found where to go to change that. Using the Xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu BSP for example * Go to bsps/arm/xilinx-zynqmp/config/xilinx_zynqmp.inc * Change the “-O2” value to the different optimization flag in the CFLAGS_OPTI

Re: [PATCH] improve the format error reporting on i386

On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:17 PM Zacchaeus Leung wrote: > > --- > cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c b/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/cpu.c > index 77b7a7161c..3c5b7db316 100644 > --- a/cpukit/score/cpu/i386/

Re: Ticket 4503

Hi Zack, https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4503 The malloc implementation exists in the score as the Heap Manager. search for "Heap_" within cpukit to get some ideas where to look. @Joel are these two tickets duplicates? https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4503 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4271 -Geda

Re: [PATCH] tester/zynqmp: Simpify the reasons to reset

Comment below. On 9/6/2021 23:38, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns - Only reset if the bootloader error is hardware related. --- tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xilinx_zynqmp_ilp32_zu3eg.ini | 2 +- tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_zu3eg.ini | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 inser

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] tester/zynqmp: Limit the restarts to 3

Looks good. On 9/6/2021 23:31, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns --- tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_zu3eg.ini | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_zu3eg.ini b/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/xilinx_zynqmp_lp64_zu3e

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] tester/telnet: Only reopen once a second

Looks good to me. On 9/6/2021 23:31, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns - Limit the reopen to once a second - Make sure the socket is closed when reopening --- tester/rt/telnet.py | 10 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/telnet.py b/tes

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] misc/tftprpoxy: Correctly scale the protocol timeout

Looks good to me. On 9/6/2021 23:31, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns - Fix data decoding - Fix get MAC call --- misc/tools/tftpproxy.py | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/misc/tools/tftpproxy.py b/misc/tools/tftpproxy.py index c0aebb

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] tester: Count tester header errors

Patch looks good except for one comment below. On 9/6/2021 23:31, chr...@rtems.org wrote: From: Chris Johns - Remove the hard tester error and count the header errors. --- tester/rt/config.py | 2 +- tester/rt/report.py | 32 +++- tester/rt/test.py | 7 +