On 2/6/21 4:20 am, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 19:24, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:26 AM Jan Sommer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This is a follow-up on this discussion regarding the installed header files
>>> in libbsd: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/20
Hi
Over in RTEMS, we have a GSoC student looking at adding the new methods
called out in the draft Issue 8. The first step would be adding prototypes
for these. I assume these would be guarded by _POSIX_VERSION with the
appropriate value. If all this much is correct, then the stumbling block
is...
On 01/06/2021 19:24, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:26 AM Jan Sommer wrote:
Hello,
This is a follow-up on this discussion regarding the installed header files
in libbsd: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-April/066211.html
The current situation is, that for example
This looks like it should fix the issue.
OK to push.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 1:06 PM Harrison Edward Gerber
wrote:
> From: Harrison Edward Gerber
>
> See also CID 1468684
>
> Closes #4445
> ---
> cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-remote-tcp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletio
From: Harrison Edward Gerber
See also CID 1468684
Closes #4445
---
cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-remote-tcp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-remote-tcp.c
b/cpukit/libdebugger/rtems-debugger-remote-tcp.c
index 696e2deb8c
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:26 AM Jan Sommer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a follow-up on this discussion regarding the installed header files
> in libbsd: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-April/066211.html
>
> The current situation is, that for example for all machines the bus.h is
>
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:59 PM Ida Delphine wrote:
>
> Hi Gedare,
>
> With regards to your comment on discord on me looking for a tool that works
> on both patches and source files, it turns out clang-format has that
> functionality already. Here's what I found -
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/
Hello,
Currently the pc BSP in SMP mode uses a timer interrupt on cpu0 which is then
distributed to all other cores via an IPI for the scheduler tick.
This means, if cpu0 locally disables its interrupts (e.g. in a driver), all
schedulers lose their sense of time.
Worst case this could lead to a
