HI Dr. Sherrill,
Thanks a lot for looking into this. I have realized my mistakes. I should
have looked around a bit more before asking on the devel.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:08 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:53 AM Richi Dubey wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have attached my
Yes, I got it. Thank you.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 12:00 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:28 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h
> > >> +++ b/cpukit/in
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:28 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h
> >> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h
> >> @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@
> >> && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STR
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Richi Dubey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h
>> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h
>> @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@
>> && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_STRONG_APA) \
>> && !defined(CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_USER)
>> #if defin
Hi
I have run Coverity Scan against the master using GCC 9. I am including a
list of the number of issues reported by file. First let me be clear that
there is only one issue reported for the "core" of RTEMS (e.g. score,
rtems, posix, sapi, libcsupport). These have not been extensively analysed
Looks like the Scan and GCC version issue should be fixed by the next
release.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Matthew Krasnick
Date: Fri, Oct 30, 2020, 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [sig-scan-admin] Scan Support for GCC 10
To: j...@rtems.org , scan-admin
Hi Joel,
Thank you for being a
Hello Joel,
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 15:02, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Morello is a prototype implementation of CHERI. Binutils will remain on a
> branch and the compiler support is LLVM.
>
> Hesham.. any thoughts?
>
We are very excited about the Morello releases. It should get more
people to try ou
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:54 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 30/10/2020 14:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > No one has commented on switching Coverity runs to
> > the master with gcc 9. If we stick with rtems5 for Coverity,
> I received a "Upcoming Coverity Scan
On 30/10/2020 14:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
No one has commented on switching Coverity runs to
the master with gcc 9. If we stick with rtems5 for Coverity,
I received a "Upcoming Coverity Scan upgrade to Coverity 2020.09"
message today. Maybe the problems evaporate with this upgrade.
--
Sebast
Thanks. That did the trick. I will ask about committing it to the branch.
No one has commented on switching Coverity runs to
the master with gcc 9. If we stick with rtems5 for Coverity,
I just don't think it has much value.
Any thoughts?
--joel
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 2:58 AM Sebastian Huber <
Hello, Joel,
You are right, for the MVME6100 the configuration in libbsd is still missing.
There is also missing the
old NIC. Chris has already sent me information about it. I'll try to do that
next week.
But I have to put two MVME6100s into production by the end of the month. If I
can't do tha
On 29/10/2020 22:15, Joel Sherrill wrote:
When I build RTEMS with GCC 9 (sparc/leon3) to get Coverity results, I
get this error linking tests that I don't get with gcc 10. I am using
the same newlib and binutils-gdb source so I am a bit confused. Are
there patches in GCC 10 that I need on GCC
12 matches
Mail list logo
