Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] break fenv.c file to function files

> On 27-Jul-2020, at 12:00 PM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 27/07/2020 08:11, Eshan Dhawan wrote: > diff --git a/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h b/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h index 70bd57be4..8712b2f33 100644 --- a/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h +++

Re: is there a list to diff the rtems 4.x and 5.x

Hello, On 27/07/2020 08:15, small...@aliyun.com wrote: We decide to use rtems in our arm cortex r5 bsp. Considering the high reliability requirement, do we choose current stable 4.11.3 or future 5.1.0 ? And could somebody give me a list to display the difference between 4.11.3 and 5.1.0 ? I ju

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] break fenv.c file to function files

On 27/07/2020 08:11, Eshan Dhawan wrote: diff --git a/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h b/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h index 70bd57be4..8712b2f33 100644 --- a/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h +++ b/newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h @@ -62,6 +62,14 @@ typedef int fexcept_t; #define

Re: is there a list to diff the rtems 4.x and 5.x

On 27/7/20 4:15 pm, small...@aliyun.com wrote: > hello, > We decide to use rtems in our arm cortex r5 bsp. Considering the high > reliability requirement, do we choose current stable 4.11.3 or future 5.1.0 ? > And could somebody give me a list to display the difference between 4.11.3 and > 5.1.0 ?

is there a list to diff the rtems 4.x and 5.x

hello, We decide to use rtems in our arm cortex r5 bsp. Considering the high reliability requirement, do we choose current stable 4.11.3 or future 5.1.0 ? And could somebody give me a list to display the difference between 4.11.3 and 5.1.0 ? I just find a little change lists in the document. But

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Changed ARM fenv support similar to RISCV

>> On 27-Jul-2020, at 11:13 AM, Sebastian Huber >> wrote: > On 27/07/2020 07:38, Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: >>> On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote: Removed soft float files arm/fenv.c: Fix use of defines and format >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] break fenv.c file to function files

> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:19 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan >> --- >> newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h| 8 + >> newlib/libm/machine/arm/Makefile.am | 6 +- >> newlib/libm/machine/arm/Makefile.in

Announce: rtems-central.git

Hello, I have promoted the rtems-qual.git repo from Sebastian's personal repo area to a top level project repo. I would like to thank Sebastian for his hard work in making this repo happen. The repo is: https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/ As part of the move the repo has changed name to rtems-

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Changed ARM fenv support similar to RISCV

On 27/07/2020 07:38, Eshan Dhawan wrote: On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote: Removed soft float files arm/fenv.c: Fix use of defines and format Fix the build. Remove superfluous code. Remove parameter names in the header file. M

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Changed ARM fenv support similar to RISCV

> On 27-Jul-2020, at 10:21 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote: > >> Removed soft float files >> >> arm/fenv.c: Fix use of defines and format >> >> Fix the build. Remove superfluous code. Remove parameter names in >> the header file. Move implementati

Re: Strong APA Scheduler : First Draft

On 26/07/2020 16:03, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:21 AM Richi Dubey wrote: Dear Dr. Bloom, Please find the pull request at the following link:https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems/pull/39. It would be great if you can create a GitHub Pull Request (PR) for your branch against you

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Changed ARM fenv support similar to RISCV

On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote: Removed soft float files arm/fenv.c: Fix use of defines and format Fix the build. Remove superfluous code. Remove parameter names in the header file. Move implementation details out of the header file. Patch By : Eshan Dhawan & sebastian huber Sign

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] break fenv.c file to function files

On 25/07/2020 19:15, Eshan dhawan wrote: Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan --- newlib/libc/machine/arm/sys/fenv.h| 8 + newlib/libm/machine/arm/Makefile.am | 6 +- newlib/libm/machine/arm/Makefile.in | 34 +++- newlib/libm/machine/arm/fe_dfl_env.c | 38 +++- newli

Re: Beaglebone QEP driver design question

On 21/7/20 7:49 pm, James Fitzsimons wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a very basic version of the QEP driver for the Beaglebone black > working now. Nice. > I will tidy up my code and submit a patch in the next few days. For first > patches that are likely to require a bit of discussion etc, is the

Re: [PATCH rtems_waf v2 1/2] rtems: Add uninstall option to the list of commands

Pushed. Thanks Chris On 25/7/20 1:14 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > --- > rtems.py | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/rtems.py b/rtems.py > index ceabcd9..067a213 100644 > --- a/rtems.py > +++ b/rtems.py > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ def init(ctx, filters = None

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On 27/7/20 10:34 am, Mritunjay Sharma wrote: > > Please find the patch for PC for EPICS here > https://github.com/mritunjaysharma394/epics-mritunjay/blob/master/patches/0001-Added-Support-for-RTEMS-pc386.patch Thanks. > As an experiment, in the 4 patches I have sent to devel for RSB recipe a few

[PATCH] powerpc/io: The eieio() function clashes with FreeBSD. Change.

From: Chris Johns --- bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h b/bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h index 841df81f47..521c97801d 100644 --- a/bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h +++ b/bsps/powerpc/inc

[PATCH 5] powerpc/io: The eieio() function clashes with FreeBSD. Change.

From: Chris Johns Closes #4021 --- bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h b/bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h index 841df81f47..521c97801d 100644 --- a/bsps/powerpc/include/libcpu/io.h +++ b/bsp

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

Hi Chris and Joel, Thanks for the discussion! Please find the patch for PC for EPICS here https://github.com/mritunjaysharma394/epics-mritunjay/blob/master/patches/0001-Added-Support-for-RTEMS-pc386.patch As an experiment, in the 4 patches I have sent to devel for RSB recipe a few days pack,

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 7:27 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 27/7/20 10:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 7:06 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 27/7/20 9:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:51 AM Mritunjay Sharma > > m

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On 27/7/20 10:22 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 7:06 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 27/7/20 9:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:51 AM Mritunjay Sharma > mailto:mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> > >

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020, 7:06 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 27/7/20 9:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:51 AM Mritunjay Sharma < > mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > To update you all, I have sent the

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On 27/7/20 9:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:51 AM Mritunjay Sharma > wrote: > > Hello all,  > > To update you all, I have sent the first version of PATCHES that > implement an RSB recipe for EPICS7 building with RTEMS5 for

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On 27/7/20 4:17 am, Mritunjay Sharma wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Meanwhile, I publish a couple of blogs of the learnings I made in this phase, > tonight, Thanks. I cannot find in your blog [1] where you have documented building the PC BSP with the legacy stack for EPICS by hand? This is an impo

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Weekly thread: Preparing RSB recipies for EPICS

On 22/7/20 6:16 am, Mritunjay Sharma wrote: > I cancelled the earlier message because the log file size was very big > and could not be posted in the devel list. OK. If we need a large log it is normally compressed and loaded onto a server somewhere and a link provided. > > [UPDATE]: Applying PA

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 8:51 AM Mritunjay Sharma < mritunjaysharma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > To update you all, I have sent the first version of PATCHES that > implement an RSB recipe for EPICS7 building with RTEMS5 for pc-386. > > While the build was successful for pc-386, I have doub

Re: [GSoC 2020]: Doubts in building RSB Recipe for EPICS for multiple architectures

Hello everyone, Meanwhile, I publish a couple of blogs of the learnings I made in this phase, tonight, I will request you all to kindly review the patches so that I can send the next version of them. Also kindly guide, so that the RSB recipe which works only on pc-386 can also work for other BSP

Re: Segmentation fault whie setting up translation table for small pages in ARMv7 MMU

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 9:12 PM Hesham Almatary < hesham.almat...@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 2:04 PM Utkarsh Rai > wrote: > >> Hello, >> I was facing issues while changing the memory entries for a section. The >> thread can be viewed here >>

Re: Segmentation fault whie setting up translation table for small pages in ARMv7 MMU

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 2:04 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > Hello, > I was facing issues while changing the memory entries for a section. The > thread can be viewed here > . The > error is most probably due to the fact that while I change th

Re: Segmentation fault whie setting up translation table for small pages in ARMv7 MMU

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 6:04 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > Hello, > I was facing issues while changing the memory entries for a section. The > thread can be viewed here. The error is most probably due to the fact that > while I change the memory entry of my desired region it ends up changing the >

Re: Strong APA Scheduler : First Draft

Richi, On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:21 AM Richi Dubey wrote: > > Dear Dr. Bloom, > > Please find the pull request at the following link: > https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems/pull/39. > It would be great if you can create a GitHub Pull Request (PR) for your branch against your "master" branch in your

Segmentation fault whie setting up translation table for small pages in ARMv7 MMU

Hello, I was facing issues while changing the memory entries for a section. The thread can be viewed here . The error is most probably due to the fact that while I change the memory entry of my desired region it ends up changing the mem