The implementation files are taken forn FreeBSD.
All the Auto-Generated files have been removed.
The Patch is tested against RSB but there is no BSP
for aarch64 so running testsuite is not possible.
Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan
---
newlib/libc/machine/aarch64/machine/fenv-fp.h | 156 +++
Is this the same error Heinz said he got every other time? Try it
twice, see what happens...
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:31 PM Mritunjay Sharma
wrote:
>
>
> Thank you so much Heinz for such a detailed response.
> It really helped me a lot.
>
> As advised by you and Heinz, I changed the source to
>
Thank you so much Heinz for such a detailed response.
It really helped me a lot.
As advised by you and Heinz, I changed the source to
https://github.com/mritunjaysharma394/ptpd/archive/master.zip
with suggested changes. However, I have encountered few bugs again related
to autoreconf.
It looks som
Hello Vijay,
On 04/06/2020 21:36, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I had been looking for an opportunity to do this for a long time and I'm
> excited to post that LVGL apps on RTEMS can now use input devices
> through the evdev interface!
Sounds like a nice feature.
>
> I prepared some BS
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 6:19 PM Hesham Almatary
wrote:
> Hello Utkarsh,
>
> TTBR1 is there primarily for UNIX-like kernels to be re-mapped at very
> high addresses and user space can use TTBR0. In the case of RTEMS, we
> don't have that user vs kernel separation. Furthermore, using TTBR1
> won't a
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 6:49 AM Hesham Almatary wrote:
>
> Hello Utkarsh,
>
> TTBR1 is there primarily for UNIX-like kernels to be re-mapped at very
> high addresses and user space can use TTBR0. In the case of RTEMS, we
> don't have that user vs kernel separation. Furthermore, using TTBR1
> won't
Hello Utkarsh,
TTBR1 is there primarily for UNIX-like kernels to be re-mapped at very
high addresses and user space can use TTBR0. In the case of RTEMS, we
don't have that user vs kernel separation. Furthermore, using TTBR1
won't allow us to do 1:1 fixed mappings.
Could you give more details why
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:42 PM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> On 05/06/2020 12:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:59 PM Christian Mauderer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Vijay,
> >>
> >> On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >>> ---
> >>> lv_drv_conf.h | 6 +
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:44 PM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> On 05/06/2020 12:13, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 PM Christian Mauderer
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> >>> ---
> >>> .gitmodules | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed,
On 05/06/2020 12:13, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 PM Christian Mauderer
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>>> ---
>>> .gitmodules | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/.gitmodules b/.gitmodules
On 05/06/2020 12:29, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:59 PM Christian Mauderer
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Vijay,
>>
>> On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>>> ---
>>> lv_drv_conf.h | 6 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lv_
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:59 PM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
> Hello Vijay,
>
> On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > ---
> > lv_drv_conf.h | 6 +-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lv_drv_conf.h b/lv_drv_conf.h
> > index 697ceaf..e8d2c40 100
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:00 PM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > ---
> > .gitmodules | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/.gitmodules b/.gitmodules
> > index 5bf0006..69d2d5c 100644
> > --- a/.gitmodules
On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> ---
> .gitmodules | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/.gitmodules b/.gitmodules
> index 5bf0006..69d2d5c 100644
> --- a/.gitmodules
> +++ b/.gitmodules
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> [submodule "lv_drivers"]
> pa
Hello Vijay,
On 04/06/2020 20:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> ---
> lv_drv_conf.h | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lv_drv_conf.h b/lv_drv_conf.h
> index 697ceaf..e8d2c40 100644
> --- a/lv_drv_conf.h
> +++ b/lv_drv_conf.h
> @@ -322,7 +322,11 @@
> #
Hello,
We came across the PPSi library for PTP support some time ago:
https://ohwr.org/project/ppsi
In their documentation its says they started with ptpd and then made an
overhaul of the source code.
They also claim portability as one of their goals. We haven't had time to look
at it closer ye
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:34 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Ok.
>
Thanks. Pushed to master.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
17 matches
Mail list logo
