Re: Release sources

2020-03-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 2020-03-20 14:57, Chris Johns wrote: Only having sources in `sources` is a change from how RTEMS has been released in the past so I feel this needs to be discussed and approved before I make any changes. I will place all source in `sources`. Chris ___

Re: discussion related to implementation of File descriptor functions in RTEMS

2020-03-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25/03/2020 20:33, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:17 AM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:01 AM Joel Sherrill mailto:j...@rtems.org>> wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:57 PM Eshan Dhawan mailto:eshandhaw

Re: [PATCH] This patch provides usage of RTEMS cross-compiler over GCC cross-compiler

2020-03-25 Thread Utkarsh Rai
Sorry, I did not look into it deeply enough. I will make the necessary changes. On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:44 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > short commit message is a bit wordy. It doesn't need to be a sentence. > We know it is a patch/commit. > > See https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Git#GitCommi

Re: GSoC Students: Submit Draft Applications

2020-03-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi Students, I see several of you have submitted "Draft, shared" in GSoC App. That is good, but I also want you to know that you can upload your Final PDF multiple times before the deadline, so don't be afraid to do that early and often. Gedare On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:24 PM Gedare Bloom wrote

Re: discussion related to implementation of File descriptor functions in RTEMS

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
these are the methods I couldn't find in the compliance guide. sys/stat.h: int utimensat sys/stat.h: int _fstat sys/_default_fcntl.h: extern int futimesat sys/time.h: int futimesat The list of these methods was made by @Vaibhav Gupta

Re: discussion related to implementation of File descriptor functions in RTEMS

2020-03-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:09 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:03 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:17 AM Eshan Dhawan >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:01 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:57

Re: discussion related to implementation of File descriptor functions in RTEMS

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:03 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:17 AM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:01 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:57 PM Eshan Dhawan >>> wrote: >>> Hello everyone, As @Vaibhav Gup

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:43 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:21 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:59 PM Eshan Dhawan >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I went through the implementations in

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:21 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:59 PM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > >> > >> I went through the implementations in FreeBSD, NetBSD and musl > >> they all require fork(). > >> So they c

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:21 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:59 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: >> >> I went through the implementations in FreeBSD, NetBSD and musl >> they all require fork(). >> So they can't be used by RTEMS. > > > Read https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/96

Re: [PATCH] This patch provides usage of RTEMS cross-compiler over GCC cross-compiler

2020-03-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
short commit message is a bit wordy. It doesn't need to be a sentence. We know it is a patch/commit. See https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Git#GitCommits (which should probably be in the docs, it is linked from https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/vc-users.html#creating-a-patch) On Wed

Re: discussion related to ipc.h

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
> On 26-Mar-2020, at 12:42 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >  > No need to put discussion in the subject. As Gedare pointed out, all email > threads are discussions by definition. ;) > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:32 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I went through the implementati

Re: discussion related to implementation of File descriptor functions in RTEMS

2020-03-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:17 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:01 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:57 PM Eshan Dhawan >> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> As @Vaibhav Gupta suggested I have also >>> added adding file descriptor functions to my

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:59 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > I went through the implementations in FreeBSD, NetBSD and musl > they all require fork(). > So they can't be used by RTEMS. > Read https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/wordexp.html and see that it even includes an examp

Re: discussion related to ipc.h

2020-03-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
No need to put discussion in the subject. As Gedare pointed out, all email threads are discussions by definition. ;) On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:32 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I went through the implementation of sys/ipc.h in various platforms. > From FreeBSD, it is difficult to i

[PATCH] This patch provides usage of RTEMS cross-compiler over GCC cross-compiler

2020-03-25 Thread utkarsh.ra...@gmail.com
--- user/start/tools.rst | 31 +++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/start/tools.rst b/user/start/tools.rst index c3f039b..c3147e8 100644 --- a/user/start/tools.rst +++ b/user/start/tools.rst @@ -76,3 +76,34 @@ source code used. Add ``--verbose``

Re: discussion related to source for porting headers and methods to RTEMS and newlib

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:40 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:18 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >>> email subject can be shortened. almost everything is a discussion :) >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:49 PM Eshan

discussion related to ipc.h

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
Hello everyone, I went through the implementation of sys/ipc.h in various platforms. >From FreeBSD, it is difficult to implement file as warned by Joel. but then I went through musl implementation it is easy to comprehend But it has a kind of architecture-specific implementation. FreeBSD > ipc.h

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
I went through the implementations in FreeBSD, NetBSD and musl they all require fork(). So they can't be used by RTEMS. On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:17 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hi Eshan, > > We can work with the newlib community. Some things can be done in > newlib that are only for RTEMS, while s

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
Hi Eshan, We can work with the newlib community. Some things can be done in newlib that are only for RTEMS, while some things we should share with others, and still more code may be not useable by RTEMS (e.g., what is in sys/linux). It is best to try to make common code available, but if some code

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
I will check the musl for a more RTEMS supported implementation. but will newlib change the implementation?? On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:26 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 2:00 PM Eshan Dhawan > wrote: > >> I have also checked wordexp.h is completely present in newlib >> (l

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself to Write After Approval

2020-03-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 8:30 PM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 25/03/2020 15:59, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Gedare Bloom > > wrote: > > > > Looks good, please push. > > > > Pushed! :)

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself to Write After Approval

2020-03-25 Thread Christian Mauderer
On 25/03/2020 15:59, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: > > Looks good, please push. > > Pushed! :) Congratulations. Your maintainer status is now officially documented. Best regards Christian > > On Tu

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself to Write After Approval

2020-03-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Looks good, please push. > > Pushed! :) > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee > wrote: > > > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 437b554

Re: Update POSIX compliance guide

2020-03-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 2:00 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > I have also checked wordexp.h is completely present in newlib > (libc/include) > the implementation of the functions wordexp.c and wordfree.c is in > (libc/posix) > But the compliance status shows not supported. > I don't see them in libc.a

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself to Write After Approval

2020-03-25 Thread Gedare Bloom
Looks good, please push. On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 1:49 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > --- > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 437b55418b..29e22357a5 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ Pavel

Re: discussion related to source for porting headers and methods to RTEMS and newlib

2020-03-25 Thread Eshan Dhawan
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:18 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> email subject can be shortened. almost everything is a discussion :) >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:49 PM Eshan Dhawan >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello everyone, >> > I have identified