Re: sparc-erc32 testsuites failures

I have updated the doc to use erc32-sis, and attached the patch file in this mail. Can someone review it. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM Niteesh wrote: > I know this, but the docs are not updated so should I send a pull request? > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:06 PM Vaibhav Gupta > wrote: >

dl06

Hallo, on which platform passes the dl06 test? I tried arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu and got: *** BEGIN OF TEST libdl (RTL) 6 *** *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.9438165d2cfb9a6a67f01f5ec7ba9156abb66d7d-modified *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED-PASS *** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API RTEMS_SMP *** TE

[PATCH 3/3] imfs: Add IMFS_make_linfile()

Update #3818. --- cpukit/Makefile.am | 1 + cpukit/include/rtems/imfs.h| 31 + cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_linfile.c | 18 +++- cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_load_tar.c | 29 ++--- cpukit/libfs/src/imfs/imfs_ma

[PATCH 2/3] tar01 and tar02: Do not generate tar archives

This simplifies the build and avoids some host dependencies, e.g. availability of symbolic links in the host file system. Makes it possible to validate time stamps. Update #3818. --- testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am| 41 - testsuites/libtests/tar01/tar01.t

[PATCH 1/3] Move feature macro before "config.h" include

This allows to use header includes in "config.h" to reduce the build configuration checks. Update #3818. --- cpukit/libmisc/shell/hexdump-conv.c | 7 --- cpukit/libmisc/shell/hexdump-odsyntax.c | 8 cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_date.c| 3 ++- cpukit/libmisc/sh

Re: [PATCH v2] Add TOD Hooks to allow BSP to take action when TOD is set

On 15/11/2019 15:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:59 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 14/11/2019 21:44, Joel Sherrill wrote: > +bool _TOD_Hook_Register( > +  TOD_Hook *hook > +) > +{ > +  ISR_lock_Cont

Re: rtems-doc build fail

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:48 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 18/11/19 4:45 pm, Niteesh wrote: > > When I run ./waf configure, I get *sphinx.ext.autodoc not found*, I tried > > searching for this on google but found no help, I followed both the > installation > > instruction in the rtems wiki as well

Re: sparc-erc32 testsuites failures

I know this, but the docs are not updated so should I send a pull request? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:06 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 11:12 AM Niteesh wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> The instructions are out of date by a couple of

Re: sparc-erc32 testsuites failures

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 11:12 AM Niteesh wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> The instructions are out of date by a couple of months. The SPARC >> Instruction Simulator (sis) has seen significant enhancements and it's now >> a standalone program. It is not enabled as

Re: psxfenv01 fails to compile for RISCV

On 11/11/2019 23:35, Chris Johns wrote: On 12/11/19 12:10 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 11/11/2019 07:04, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 09/11/2019 19:57, Joel Sherrill wrote: I thought I fixed this in the upstream newlib. https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=9e06ba

Re: rtems-doc build fail

On 18/11/19 4:45 pm, Niteesh wrote: > When I run ./waf configure, I get *sphinx.ext.autodoc not found*, I tried > searching for this on google but found no help, I followed both the > installation > instruction in the rtems wiki as well as the sphinx. But both didn't help. Did you follow the inst

rtems-doc build fail

When I run ./waf configure, I get *sphinx.ext.autodoc not found*, I tried searching for this on google but found no help, I followed both the installation instruction in the rtems wiki as well as the sphinx. But both didn't help. ___ devel mailing list de

Re: sparc-erc32 testsuites failures

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > The instructions are out of date by a couple of months. The SPARC > Instruction Simulator (sis) has seen significant enhancements and it's now > a standalone program. It is not enabled as a built-in with gdb because > that's some very old ver

[PATCH 3/4] sb: Align the version processing with rtems-tools.

From: Chris Johns - Use the same VERSION file format as rtems-tools so a common release generation can be used. - The version.py is almost the same as rtems-tools. There are some minor differences, one is the RTEMS version is present in this file while rtems-tool uses config/rtems-release.

[PATCH 1/4] sb: Add support for a comma separated release path list.

From: Chris Johns Updates #3814 --- source-builder/sb/download.py | 32 +--- source-builder/sb/version.py | 9 + 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/source-builder/sb/download.py b/source-builder/sb/download.py index 1fb0155..e19

[PATCH 4/4] rtems/kernel: Fix the git download extension for the kernel.

From: Chris Johns --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-common.cfg | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-common.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-common.cfg index 6749937..dfb12c6 100644 --- a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-common

[PATCH 2/4] rtems: Fix kernel and tools release source package selection.

From: Chris Johns Closes #3814 --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-kernel-common.cfg | 9 - rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-5.cfg | 6 -- rtems/config/tools/rtems-libbsd-common.cfg | 9 +++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 11 --- 4 files changed, 23 insert

Re: sparc-erc32 testsuites failures

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019, 1:42 PM Niteesh wrote: > The test's for the sparc-erc32 BSP fail's. when running rtems-test for > this particular BSP it fails for almost all test cases, the error message: > > *undefined target command: "sim"* > > I think it's because the tests are run using sparc-rtems-gdb

Re: Hello World Patch

Hello Shubham Bhagat, sorry, I missed the IRC question: In my experience our community doesn't have lot of active people in IRC. You can try to mention some of the connected and available people so they get pinged. For me that works if I'm in front of a PC that is connected to my IRC-Bouncer and i

sparc-erc32 testsuites failures

The test's for the sparc-erc32 BSP fail's. when running rtems-test for this particular BSP it fails for almost all test cases, the error message: *undefined target command: "sim"* I think it's because the tests are run using sparc-rtems-gdb, but the sis target was disabled in this commit: https:/