[PATCH] bsp/erc32: Improve pseudo-SMP support

Add support for _SMP_Send_message() to the own processor. This is required by the smpmulticast01 test program. --- bsps/sparc/erc32/start/bspsmp.c | 84 c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/erc32/Makefile.am | 3 +- 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) c

Re: [PATCH] user: Document patch review process

On 01/10/2019 01:40, Chris Johns wrote: On 30/9/19 10:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: --- images/user/patch-review.png | Bin 0 -> 57130 bytes images/user/patch-review.puml | 44 +++ user/support/contrib.rst | 67 +- 3 fi

Re: [PATCH] user: Document patch review process

On 30/9/19 10:45 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > images/user/patch-review.png | Bin 0 -> 57130 bytes > images/user/patch-review.puml | 44 +++ > user/support/contrib.rst | 67 > +- > 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 14

Re: [PATCH] eng: Add Software Requirements Engineering chapter

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:13 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 24/07/2019 15:44, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > +Requirement Traceability > > + > > + > > +The standard |E10-06| demands that requirements shall be under > > configuration > > +management, backwards-traceable and f

How to build start.o using waf?

Hello, I would like to work on a new build system prototype. The idea is to use specification items maintained by Doorstop (YAML files), a Python configuration script and waf to build RTEMS and the tests. This is similar to the libbsd build. The difference is that in libbsd the build data is

Re: [PATCH] eng: Add Software Requirements Engineering chapter

On 24/07/2019 15:44, Sebastian Huber wrote: +Requirement Traceability + + +The standard |E10-06| demands that requirements shall be under configuration +management, backwards-traceable and forward-traceable. + +History of Requirements +--- + +The RTEMS

[PATCH] user: Document patch review process

--- images/user/patch-review.png | Bin 0 -> 57130 bytes images/user/patch-review.puml | 44 +++ user/support/contrib.rst | 67 +- 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) create mode 100644 images/user/patch-review

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Remove Martin Galvan

Remove Martin Galvan due to inactivity from the Write After Approval list. --- MAINTAINERS | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 2732d773c4..68137a80d9 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ Write After Approval ==

[PATCH 1/2] Move contributing content from eng to user

--- eng/management.rst | 1 - eng/why-contribute.rst | 151 --- user/support/contrib.rst | 146 + 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 eng/why-contribute.rst diff

[PATCH 2/2] user: Update contributing section

--- user/support/contrib.rst | 41 +++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/support/contrib.rst b/user/support/contrib.rst index fb95e34..04c5dd8 100644 --- a/user/support/contrib.rst +++ b/user/support/contrib.rst @@ -21,8 +21,

[PATCH] eng: Update issue tracking section

--- eng/issue-tracking.rst | 21 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/eng/issue-tracking.rst b/eng/issue-tracking.rst index 62c8a28..1039b41 100644 --- a/eng/issue-tracking.rst +++ b/eng/issue-tracking.rst @@ -1,21 +1,16 @@ .. SPDX-License-Identifie

Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: add freedom E310 Arty A7 bsp

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 12:03 PM Hesham Almatary wrote: > > Hi Pragnesh, > > That's a so much better refined patch, thanks! Please find my minor > comments inlined below. > > After the patch gets merged, could you please add a new section about > that BSP to the RISC-V chapter doc here [1]? > > [1