Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/07/2019 06:35, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: You have to maintain this information per CPU. Have made changes. https://github.com/rmeena840/rtems-tools/commit/b70b1f820241ab97828c29a23982a4b34b95fe03 https://github.com/rmeena840/rtems-tools/commit/0becdc4025583d255f9ef976cfde275a8660

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 23/07/2019 06:35, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: [19:16:31.180096211] (+?.?) Record_Item sched_switch: { cpu_id = 17 }, { prev_comm = "7392", prev_tid = 7392, prev_prio = 0, prev_state = 0, next_comm = "167837739", next_tid = 167837739, next_prio = 0 } [19:16:31.180116542] (+0.20331)

[PATCH v2] user/exe : Add Device Tree section

2019-07-22 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
--- user/exe/device-tree.rst | 100 +++ user/exe/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 user/exe/device-tree.rst diff --git a/user/exe/device-tree.rst b/user/exe/device-tree.rst new file mode 100644 index 000..fcbcfd

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

2019-07-22 Thread Ravindra Kumar Meena
> > You have to maintain this information per CPU. > Have made changes. https://github.com/rmeena840/rtems-tools/commit/b70b1f820241ab97828c29a23982a4b34b95fe03 https://github.com/rmeena840/rtems-tools/commit/0becdc4025583d255f9ef976cfde275a86601d11 I have set state value to 0 as of now. I will

Re: [PATCH] RTEMS BSP Buildset

2019-07-22 Thread Chris Johns
On 23/7/19 7:14 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 6:13 PM wrote: >> >> This series of patches adds BSP buildset support to the RSB. A top level >> BSP buildset can be added that can include the tools, kernel and 3rd party >> packages, such as libbsd. A single buildset command will

Re: Change Control Board (CCB) proposal for requirements

2019-07-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:07 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello, > > I work currently on a requirements engineering section for RTEMS in the > RTEMS Software Engineering manual: > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/index.html > > One topic is the Change Control Board (CCB). My proposal

Re: [PATCH] RTEMS BSP Buildset

2019-07-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 6:13 PM wrote: > > This series of patches adds BSP buildset support to the RSB. A top level > BSP buildset can be added that can include the tools, kernel and 3rd party > packages, such as libbsd. A single buildset command will build and install > a complete BSP development

Re: [PATCH v5] ndbm test suite

2019-07-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
Add .scn and .doc files please. Then this is probably good to go. On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:12 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > --- > testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 7 + > testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + > testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c | 299 +++

Re: [PATCH v4] ndbm test suite

2019-07-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:11 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:12 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:05 AM Vaibhav Gupta >> wrote: >> > >> > --- >> > testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 7 + >> > testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + >>

Re: GSoC PRU: simplebus vs nexus

2019-07-22 Thread Nils Hölscher
Hi, Thank you, I have got everything sorted out now. Best, Nils On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 13:45, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 22/07/2019 13:30, Nils Hölscher wrote: > > > > > I found the simplebus files in the rtems-libbsd repository, but > when > > >

Re: Requirement Identifiers

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
- Am 22. Jul 2019 um 15:55 schrieb joel j...@rtems.org: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:53 AM Sebastian Huber < > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to clarify one detail with respect to the requirement >> identifiers. The current consensus is that the requ

Re: Requirement Identifiers

2019-07-22 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 12:53 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to clarify one detail with respect to the requirement > identifiers. The current consensus is that the requirements should be > grouped by component, e.g. > > RTEMS > ^-- RTEMS-C

Re: [PATCH] user/exe : Add Device Tree section

2019-07-22 Thread Nils Hölscher
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 14:12, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nils Hölscher wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 12:41, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < >> vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> --- >>> user/exe/device-tree.rst | 100 ++

Re: [PATCH] user/exe : Add Device Tree section

2019-07-22 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nils Hölscher wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 12:41, Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> --- >> user/exe/device-tree.rst | 100 +++ >> user/exe/index.rst | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 101 inse

Re: GSoC PRU: simplebus vs nexus

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/07/2019 13:30, Nils Hölscher wrote: > I found the simplebus files in the rtems-libbsd repository, but when > building the compiler is not able to resolve the following include: > #include Not all header files are installed with a "./waf install". You can add libbsd

Re: [PATCH] user/exe : Add Device Tree section

2019-07-22 Thread Nils Hölscher
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 12:41, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > --- > user/exe/device-tree.rst | 100 +++ > user/exe/index.rst | 1 + > 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 user/exe/device-tree.rst > > diff --git a/user/exe/device-tree.

Re: GSoC PRU: simplebus vs nexus

2019-07-22 Thread Nils Hölscher
Hi, On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 13:35, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 18/07/2019 12:58, Nils Hölscher wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What is the state of simplebus in rtems-libbsd? > > It works fine. > > > I found the simplebus files in the rtems-libbsd repository, but when

[PATCH] user/exe : Add Device Tree section

2019-07-22 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
--- user/exe/device-tree.rst | 100 +++ user/exe/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 user/exe/device-tree.rst diff --git a/user/exe/device-tree.rst b/user/exe/device-tree.rst new file mode 100644 index 000..3cd52c

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/07/2019 10:48, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote: You have to figure out what these values mean. You may also ask the LTTNG mailing list. Okay. On writing to the stream file there are two possible problems: 1. In the second step writing to the stream file might not write to the correspo

Re: GSoC Project | Basic Support for Trace Compass

2019-07-22 Thread Ravindra Kumar Meena
> > You have to figure out what these values mean. You may also ask the > LTTNG mailing list. > Okay. On writing to the stream file there are two possible problems: 1. In the second step writing to the stream file might not write to the corresponding binary stream file because the item->cpu can a

Re: Change Control Board (CCB) proposal for requirements

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
For clarification, the "RTEMS user" in this section is not every RTEMS user. In order to attach digital signatures as approvals and include them in the RTEMS sources, the user must first add its public key to the RTEMS sources. This requires approval by the RTEMS maintainers. However, the infr

Change Control Board (CCB) proposal for requirements

2019-07-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, I work currently on a requirements engineering section for RTEMS in the RTEMS Software Engineering manual: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/index.html One topic is the Change Control Board (CCB). My proposal follows: Change Control Board Working with re