On 8/6/19 3:05 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:> We require that our GSoC Students keep
their contributions visible on
> their personal GitHub. I recommend that Ravindra stage the work on
> personal GitHub, and post here for review by the community. Merge from
> personal GitHub to git.rtems.org when suffici
Okay! So first let me check what files are updated till now.
On Sat, 8 Jun, 2019, 1:00 AM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> I wouldn't send the patch, I would suggest you write an email to
> discuss about how you are porting ndbm, and that the current version
> relies on the search/hash functions, and that
I wouldn't send the patch, I would suggest you write an email to
discuss about how you are porting ndbm, and that the current version
relies on the search/hash functions, and that the interface has
changed a bit over time so inquire whether you should update
hash/search functions to newer versions.
Sure! I will send the patch to newlib and ask them if they need updated set
of files inside libc/search.
On Fri, 7 Jun, 2019, 10:29 PM Gedare Bloom, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:02 PM Vaibhav Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Please review the code so that I can send it to newlib-devel.
> >
> > On Fr
Hi Ravindra,
You can find both at https://github.com/gedare/raspberry_prov/tree/dev
I guess you could probably write a barectf program that uses the
linux-fs backend to generate CTF, reading an RTEMS trace and
generating a CTF event for each kind of RTEMS event, this seems a
little bit klunky. It
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:11 AM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 7/6/19 3:51 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 07/06/2019 07:21, Chris Johns wrote:
> Should we have something working before we make any additions to the user
> manual?
> >>> It was actually my idea to add this section right now.
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:02 PM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>
> Please review the code so that I can send it to newlib-devel.
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:22 AM Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
>>
>> ---
>> newlib/libc/include/ndbm.h| 86 ++
>> newlib/libc/posix/Makefile.am | 4 +-
>> newlib/libc
Hi, Sebastian
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 08:33, Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 06/06/2019 18:11, Maksim Kozlov wrote:
> > Hello, Sebastian
> >
> > I think that this patch is necessary in two reasons.
> >
> > In general view, if we have a conditional branch, we want,
>
> My examples won't be helpful after all. I have some notes and scripts
> to convert from CTF to another format (PROV-DM), and I also have some
> examples using barectf to generate CTF traces. Let me know if you end
> up needing anything like that.
>
Okay. Please share the barectf examples.
Tha
