Hello Joel,
I only had a brief look at the patch. Please minimize the changes and
follow the current Coding Standards:
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/coding.html
Especially the Doxygen guide lines. Please avoid unnecessary white space
changes. Please try to split up the patch in
On 17/05/2019 04:26, Chris Johns wrote:
Is it this ticket?:https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2183
I looked at the changes from Sebastian and updated the cpu_asm.S to be more
close to the one of the ARM architecture.
I haven't been able to test that in detail yet, because some troubles in
getting t
Hello Jan,
there is also an amd64 BSP:
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bsps/bsps-x86_64.html#amd64
I think it was intended for further development and all the i386 is a
variants are legacy BSPs?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim,
On 17/5/19 2:11 am, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Joel Sherrill [mailto:j...@rtems.org]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2019 16:33
>> An: Sommer, Jan
>> Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org
>> Betreff: Re: SMP for pc686 BSP
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2019, 9:01 AM wr
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:36 PM Christian Mauderer
wrote:
> Hello Vijay,
>
> >
> > My forked repository for the rtems-libbsd can be found here
> > https://github.com/thelunatic/rtems-libbsd
> > All my work so far is in three branches in my forked repo.
> > The am335x_lcd branch contains the comm
---
cpukit/Makefile.am| 2 +-
cpukit/include/rtems/cbs.h| 24 +--
cpukit/include/rtems/qreslib.h| 22 +-
cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulercbs.h | 242 +++---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedu
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Joel Sherrill [mailto:j...@rtems.org]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2019 16:33
> An: Sommer, Jan
> Cc: rtems-de...@rtems.org
> Betreff: Re: SMP for pc686 BSP
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019, 9:01 AM wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been wor
On Thu, May 16, 2019, 9:01 AM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been working recently to enable SMP for the pc686-BSP and managed
> to get a basic setup running with 2 cores which currently passes 44/57
> smptests.
> Next step is to make it work for arbitrary numbers of cores. The goal is
> to push the
Hello,
I have been working recently to enable SMP for the pc686-BSP and managed to get
a basic setup running with 2 cores which currently passes 44/57 smptests.
Next step is to make it work for arbitrary numbers of cores. The goal is to
push the patches upstream. That's why I would like to ask t
On 16/05/2019 11:05, Ravindra Kumar Meena wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for the clarification. I had one approach in my mind(direct
generation of CTF) which seems failed now. Now, how should I convert
the trace data into CTF?
I looked into the codebase. I think these are the below files that
Hi Guillaume,
Thanks for sharing the valuable approach. I will definitely check them out.
Thanks
On Thu, May 16, 2019, 1:16 AM Guillaume Champagne <
guillaume.champa...@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> Hi Ravindra,
>
> If you look at the dependencies and build process of lttng-tools [1]
> and lttng-modules
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for the clarification. I had one approach in my mind(direct
generation of CTF) which seems failed now. Now, how should I convert the
trace data into CTF?
I looked into the codebase. I think these are the below files that we have
to work with.
grep -r rtems/record.h --includ
12 matches
Mail list logo
