Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

2019-01-12 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 08:41, Chris Johns wrote: > On 13/1/19 7:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > > With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid > when > > running rtems-test without the coverage option. However, it works fine > when the > > coverage option is ena

Re: rtems-test : getting result invalid

2019-01-12 Thread Chris Johns
On 13/1/19 7:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid when > running rtems-test without the coverage option. However, it works fine when > the > coverage option is enabled. > What are the command lines for each run? Chris

Re: Status of RISCV port on sis

2019-01-12 Thread Jiri Gaisler
On 1/11/19 1:36 PM, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > On 1/9/19 10:46 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Hello Jiri, >> >> could you please rebase your work to this RTEMS commit: >> >> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=b9ffc41c9678fb3c5386c1a6ab394656ec85dbc6 >> > This works fine for me - I can now pass all u

rtems-test : getting result invalid

2019-01-12 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
Hi, With the recent change to the qemu options I'm getting results invalid when running rtems-test without the coverage option. However, it works fine when the coverage option is enabled. == Passed: 1 Failed: 0 User Input: 0 Expected Fail: 0 In