Re: waf and Python 3.7

On 19/12/2018 14:10, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018, 7:31 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 19/12/2018 11:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:33 PM Chris Johns > >

Re: Potential Projects for GSoC

Hello, My apologies the trailing mail wasn't sent out in PlainText. I'm a new contributor looking forward to working on the RTEMS project and I want to know about the areas which have ongoing work which will be potential projects for GSoC. I've gone through https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Op

Potential Projects for GSoC

Hello, I'm a new contributor looking forward to working on the RTEMS project and I want to know about the areas which have ongoing work which will be potential projects for GSoC. I've gone through https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/OpenProjects . To start with, I want to take up https://devel.

Re: waf and Python 3.7

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018, 7:31 PM Chris Johns On 19/12/2018 11:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:33 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > On 19/12/2018 06:12, Christian Mauderer wrote: > > > I updated waf in rtems-tools with a reference to the ticket. I'm

Re: waf and Python 3.7

On 19/12/2018 11:49, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:33 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > On 19/12/2018 06:12, Christian Mauderer wrote: > > I updated waf in rtems-tools with a reference to the ticket. I'm still a > > little unsure about our tickets: S

Re: waf and Python 3.7

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:33 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 19/12/2018 06:12, Christian Mauderer wrote: > > I updated waf in rtems-tools with a reference to the ticket. I'm still a > > little unsure about our tickets: Should I create separate tickets for > > that problem in rtems-docs, rtems-libbsd (

Re: waf and Python 3.7

On 19/12/2018 06:12, Christian Mauderer wrote: > I updated waf in rtems-tools with a reference to the ticket. I'm still a > little unsure about our tickets: Should I create separate tickets for > that problem in rtems-docs, rtems-libbsd (both have the same problem) > and examples-v2 (I haven't test

Re: waf and Python 3.7

Am 17.12.18 um 22:32 schrieb Chris Johns: > On 18/12/2018 07:38, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 2:21 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have trouble building rtems-tools (via source builder) on an >> Arch-Linux machine with a P

[PATCH] 4.9/gcc/gcc-core-4.3.2-rtems4.9-20181217.diff: New file

Enable 4.9 tools to build with a modern makeinfo. Tested on CentOS 7. Added like other 4.9 tool patches. --- .../4.9/gcc/gcc-core-4.3.2-rtems4.9-20181217.diff | 249 + 1 file changed, 249 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/4.9/gcc/gcc-core-4.3.2-rtems4.9-20181217.diff d

[PATCH 1/2] source-builder/config/gcc*.cfg: Correct URL for MPC download

--- source-builder/config/gcc-4.3-1.cfg | 2 +- source-builder/config/gcc-4.4-1.cfg | 2 +- source-builder/config/gcc-4.5-1.cfg | 2 +- source-builder/config/gcc-4.6-1.cfg | 2 +- source-builder/config/gcc-4.7-1.cfg | 2 +- source-builder/config/gcc-4.8-1.cfg | 2 +- source-builder/config/gcc-4.9-

[PATCH 2/2] rtems-gcc: Update gcc patch so builds with new makeinfo plus binutils checksum

--- rtems/config/tools/rtems-binutils-2.19.1-1.cfg | 2 ++ rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-4.3.2-newlib-1.16.0-1.cfg | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-binutils-2.19.1-1.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-binutils-2.19.1-1.cfg index

Re: GCI Tasks Staus

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:11 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to update the COPYING patch with the GCI contributors. > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-December/023957.html > > Unfortunately the Git author names are not properly set

Re: Ideas for GSoC 2019

Hello Vijay, I'm glad to hear you will apply again. A second-year GSoC is often quite valuable for everyone involved. I think you should consider the following: 1. Coverage is always important: what can be done to leverage your knowledge base? 2. Take a look through the devel/user archives for ide

Re: RTEMS Software Engineering Handbook

I think it is OK to merge this and fix in the main docs repo. It looks to be a great start to compiling the SwE handbook. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:03 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > NOTE: Patch set attached as tarball because multiple patches contain > lines which are long enough that "git sen