[PATCH v2] configure.ac: Cygwin now has ncurses not termcap. Use standard logic.

2018-10-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
sim/erc32/Changelog: 2018-10-25 Joel Sherrill * configure.ac: Cygwin has removed libtermcap.a and now has libncurses.a. Remove the Cygwin specific hack and use the standard logic to determine which library to use. * configure: Regenerate. --- sim

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Use '.o' files for coverage analysis

2018-10-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 02:21, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:19 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < > vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 00:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> Vijay, >>> >>> Did covoar just work after adjusting the files to be .o's? Or are

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Generate reports using the object files in cpukit

2018-10-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 02:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Pushed. > > When Chris digs out from the python/python2/python3 mess, hopefully he can > figure out why the code throws an exception for some object files. :) > > I can try running for the whole test suite and find out the specific object files

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Use '.o' files for coverage analysis

2018-10-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:19 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 00:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Vijay, >> >> Did covoar just work after adjusting the files to be .o's? Or are there >> more changes? >> >> Covoar just worked after adjusting the

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Generate reports using the object files in cpukit

2018-10-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
Pushed. When Chris digs out from the python/python2/python3 mess, hopefully he can figure out why the code throws an exception for some object files. :) --joel On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:20 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > --- > tester/rt/coverage.py

[PATCH] Coverage : Generate reports using the object files in cpukit

2018-10-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
--- tester/rt/coverage.py | 27 -- tester/rtems/testing/coverage/symbol-sets.ini | 90 +-- 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/coverage.py b/tester/rt/coverage.py index c979332..978a8c4 100644 --- a/tester/rt/covera

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Use '.o' files for coverage analysis

2018-10-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 00:56, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Vijay, > > Did covoar just work after adjusting the files to be .o's? Or are there > more changes? > > Covoar just worked after adjusting the files. > If not, I just need the current patch with a good log message. > > --joel > > On Thu, Oct 25

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Use '.o' files for coverage analysis

2018-10-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
Vijay, Did covoar just work after adjusting the files to be .o's? Or are there more changes? If not, I just need the current patch with a good log message. --joel On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:06 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee < vijaykumar9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris! > > Do you find the patch alrig

Re: [PATCH] Coverage : Use '.o' files for coverage analysis

2018-10-25 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
Hi Chris! Do you find the patch alright? I was wondering if you were expecting some changes or modifications. I can do it and submit within this week. :) On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 09:06, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > mistakenly resent this. Sorry about it. > I have made a separate patch for covoa

[no subject]

2018-10-25 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Some of the rtems repos that use waf have a copy of waf at the top of the tree, rtems-libbsd doesn't. I filed https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3553 about this. I used the waf from examples-v2 to build it myself. What version of waf should I commit to this repo? It is definitely better for it to

Re: Update of libbsd to close to FreeBSD 12 release planned

2018-10-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25/10/2018 08:59, Chris Johns wrote: On 25/10/2018 17:55, Sebastian Huber wrote: I updated the libbsd to the FreeBSD head 2018-10-23. The code freeze on the FreeBSD head was lifted 2018-10-21. This update includes an OpenSSL library version update to 1.1.1. Do you think libbsd is stable to

Re: Update of libbsd to close to FreeBSD 12 release planned

2018-10-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 25/10/2018 17:55, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > I updated the libbsd to the FreeBSD head 2018-10-23. The code freeze on the > FreeBSD head was lifted 2018-10-21. > > This update includes an OpenSSL library version update to 1.1.1. > Do you think libbsd is stable to consider a branch for release