Hi
I submitted a build this morning and 6 were noted as resolved.
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/rtems
Still multiple outstanding.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ensure that the rtems_libio_set_private_env() was successful before the
chroot().
Update #3530.
---
cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
index b319dae9ed..08c39da31f 100644
--- a/cpukit/ftp
Move the user name to the session information.
Update #3530.
---
cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
index fb67335c0c..25656134fb 100644
--- a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
+++ b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
@@ -265,6 +2
Update #3530.
---
cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c | 15 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
index 25656134fb..c9f6f656e3 100644
--- a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
+++ b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
@@ -1968,19 +1968,16 @@ ftpd_daemon(rtems_task_argu
There is no need to keep the password throughout the session.
Update #3530.
---
cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c | 10 +-
testsuites/libtests/ftp01/ftp01.scn | 32
testsuites/libtests/ftp01/init.c| 25 ++---
3 files changed, 51 i
They are superfluous and just bloat the code.
Update #3530.
---
cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c | 15 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
index 0d713c03e8..ccb2a93410 100644
--- a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
+++ b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
@@
Update #3530.
---
cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
index c9f6f656e3..b319dae9ed 100644
--- a/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
+++ b/cpukit/ftpd/ftpd.c
@@ -2041,6 +2041,8 @@ ftpd_daemon(rtems_task_argument args RTEMS_UNUSED)
}
On 05/10/2018 15:33, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 14:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 13:43, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 13:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 12:44, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Dan
On 2018-10-05 14:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 13:43, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 13:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 12:44, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Se
On 05/10/2018 13:43, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 13:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 12:44, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Da
Avoid the use of a constant register variable which is used in some
conditions. This gets rid of a clang -Wsometimes-uninitialized warning.
---
cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/readinode.c | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/jffs2/src/readinode.c
b/cpukit
On 2018-10-05 13:01, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 12:44, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Se
On 05/10/2018 09:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
malloc04 and malloctest tests from the rtems test-suite fails
when checking the return value of malloc(). The check is
optimized away and always fails.
---
testsuites/libtests/malloc04/init.c | 6 ++
testsuites/libtests/malloctest/init.c | 1 +
On 05/10/2018 12:44, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Da
On 2018-10-05 09:41, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
This fixes the followin
malloc04 and malloctest tests from the rtems test-suite fails
when checking the return value of malloc(). The check is
optimized away and always fails.
---
testsuites/libtests/malloc04/init.c | 6 ++
testsuites/libtests/malloctest/init.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/
On 05/10/2018 16:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> You use Python 2. I have Python 3. It doesn't run that far to figure out that
> this option is not available.
Ah OK. There could be an issue with python3 and given python2 is now not
available on MSYS2 it will need to work.
Chris
_
On 05/10/2018 09:38, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
This fixes the following test failures on LEON3 UP/SMP when
built usi
On 05/10/2018 16:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
> A better implementation would mabe be to configure the default compiler
> to LLVM when building rtems-tools?
Yes I agree this is a better solution and more helpful. It means we need to
figure out a way to determine the `cc_name`.
What does a clang $C
Use the non-standard typeof operator to avoid code generation errors
with clang and use of uninitialized variable warnings with GCC and
Coverity Scan.
Update #3465.
---
cpukit/include/linux/rbtree.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/linux/rbtre
On 2018-10-05 09:34, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
This fixes the following test failures on LEON3 UP/SMP when
built using clang compiler:
* fsjffs2gc01
* jffs2_f
On 05/10/2018 09:25, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
This fixes the following test failures on LEON3 UP/SMP when
built using clang compiler:
* fsjffs2gc01
* jffs2_fserror
* jffs2_fspermission
* jffs2_fsrdwr
On 2018-10-05 09:14, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
malloc04 and malloctest tests from the rtems test-suite fails
when checking the return value of malloc(). The check is
optimized away and always fails.
Please change the patch to use RTEMS_OBFUSCATE_VARI
On 2018-10-05 09:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
This fixes the following test failures on LEON3 UP/SMP when
built using clang compiler:
* fsjffs2gc01
* jffs2_fserror
* jffs2_fspermission
* jffs2_fsrdwr
* jffs2_fstime
The problem is probably in
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
From: Jacob Hansen
This commits bypasses a static assert when using the Clang compiler.
This is done as the static assertion does not compile with Clang
("static_assert expression is not an integral constant expression").
I am not sure this static a
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
malloc04 and malloctest tests from the rtems test-suite fails
when checking the return value of malloc(). The check is
optimized away and always fails.
Please change the patch to use RTEMS_OBFUSCATE_VARIABLE() in the spots
where the compiler tries t
On 05/10/2018 08:57, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
This fixes the following test failures on LEON3 UP/SMP when
built using clang compiler:
* fsjffs2gc01
* jffs2_fserror
* jffs2_fspermission
* jffs2_fsrdwr
* jffs2_fstime
The problem is probably in the rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe().
27 matches
Mail list logo