Hello Sebastian,
On 2018-09-20 07:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Daniel,
thanks for your status report. The RSB uses currently GCC 7.3.0
without patches and the Newlib commit
d13c84eb07e35984bf7a974cd786a6cdac29e6b9.
Thanks for the information, our toolchain was built using
916ef5fb8865f72
I am not sure if we should introduce this Newlib-specific functions in
throughout the code base. The siprintf() is currently not used. I am
more in favour to enable the FPU for the corresponding tasks.
The rest of the patch series looks good.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address :
On 19/09/2018 17:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Just an aside that I have done a fair amount of clean up on the
bsp_specs on a local branch with corresponding GCC patches to begin to
eliminate the need for them.
I think the x86_64 tools are built with a subset of that patch and
have an empty bsp_sp
Hello Daniel,
thanks for your status report. The RSB uses currently GCC 7.3.0 without
patches and the Newlib commit d13c84eb07e35984bf7a974cd786a6cdac29e6b9.
On 19/09/2018 14:46, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to share the current test status for the GR740 I have
today, using the
Just an aside that I have done a fair amount of clean up on the bsp_specs
on a local branch with corresponding GCC patches to begin to eliminate the
need for them.
I think the x86_64 tools are built with a subset of that patch and have an
empty bsp_specs. Hopefully after the next rtems release I c
From: Jacob Hansen
This is needed for building rtems correctly with Clang.
Note that this change does not mean rtems can build correctly with
mainline clang. However the change allows building rtems with a
Clang toolchain that has a rtems frontend similar that of GCC's
builtin rtems specs.
---
---
bsps/sparc/shared/uart/cons.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/bsps/sparc/shared/uart/cons.c b/bsps/sparc/shared/uart/cons.c
index 37f448c..410d6e2 100644
--- a/bsps/sparc/shared/uart/cons.c
+++ b/bsps/sparc/shared/uart/cons.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include
#include
+#incl
---
testsuites/smptests/smp03/init.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smp03/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smp03/init.c
index 3ad0352..cd6bba1 100644
--- a/testsuites/smptests/smp03/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smp03/init.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
From: Martin Aberg
When the CCSDS/CCITT CRC-16 and 16-bit ISO-checksum logic is available in
GRSPW2, the DCRCT field is used to determine how to generate the CRC/checksum
code. grspw_hw_sup has been extended with the field ccsds_crc
---
bsps/sparc/include/bsp/grspw_pkt.h | 16 ++--
b
calling rtems_print_printer_fprintf_putc() results in usage of vfprintf()
which may use floating point instructions in its implementation.
---
testsuites/tmtests/tm26/system.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/testsuites/tmtests/tm26/system.h b/testsuites/tmtests/tm26/system.h
in
---
bsps/sparc/shared/spw/grspw_pkt.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bsps/sparc/shared/spw/grspw_pkt.c
b/bsps/sparc/shared/spw/grspw_pkt.c
index ff481f2..39f5087 100644
--- a/bsps/sparc/shared/spw/grspw_pkt.c
+++ b/bsps/sparc/shared/spw/grspw_pkt.c
@@ -1470,
---
cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/cpuimpl.h
index c125b8a..7c31501 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/inclu
From: Martin Aberg
This is a workaround for a L2CACHE scrubber corner case described in GR740
User's Manual, Version 1.10, section 43.2.30.
The issue affects some version of the L2CACHE. However, since the performance
impact of the workaround is marginal, special device probing logic has been
av
From: Daniel Cederman
---
cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/syscall.S | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/syscall.S b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/syscall.S
index 574cf66..603ed7a 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/syscall.S
+++ b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/syscall.S
@@ -212,
---
bsps/sparc/shared/btimer/tlib_ckinit.c | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/sparc/shared/btimer/tlib_ckinit.c
b/bsps/sparc/shared/btimer/tlib_ckinit.c
index 3e2feb1..6643335 100644
--- a/bsps/sparc/shared/btimer/tlib_ckinit.c
+++ b/bsps/sparc/share
---
bsps/sparc/shared/iommu/griommu.c | 3 ++-
bsps/sparc/shared/l2c/l2c.c | 2 +-
bsps/sparc/shared/pci/gr_701.c | 14 +++---
bsps/sparc/shared/pci/gr_cpci_gr740.c | 12 ++--
bsps/sparc/shared/pci/gr_leon4_n2x.c| 12 ++
---
bsps/sparc/leon3/clock/ckinit.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/bsps/sparc/leon3/clock/ckinit.c b/bsps/sparc/leon3/clock/ckinit.c
index c3edaf2..0cd78ea 100644
--- a/bsps/sparc/leon3/clock/ckinit.c
+++ b/bsps/sparc/leon3/clock/ckinit.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
*/
#include
+#
From: Daniel Cederman
---
cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/sparcimpl.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/sparcimpl.h
b/cpukit/score/cpu/sparc/include/rtems/score/sparcimpl.h
index 9fb..81b4441 100644
--- a/cpukit/score/c
From: Daniel Cederman
---
testsuites/fstests/fserror/test.c| 8 +++---
testsuites/fstests/fspermission/test.c | 2 +-
testsuites/fstests/fsrename/test.c | 44
testsuites/libtests/block06/init.c | 4 +--
testsuites/psxtests/psxfile01/test.
Hi,
I just wanted to share the current test status for the GR740 I have
today, using the todays master with some additional test fixes which I
plan to submit shortly. The test have been run both on TSIM and hardware.
Current test results for the RTEMS test-suite with GCC-7.2 toolchain for
th
It works now with your patch. Thanks again.
Daniel
On 2018-09-19 12:23, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Thanks for looking into it Sebastian. I will try it out now.
On 2018-09-19 12:00, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On 19/09/2018 11:32, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hi,
When I rebased earlier th
Thanks for looking into it Sebastian. I will try it out now.
On 2018-09-19 12:00, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Daniel,
On 19/09/2018 11:32, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hi,
When I rebased earlier this week four SMP test now fails (smp03,
smppsxaffinity01, smpschedaffinity04, smpschedaffinity05).
Hello Daniel,
On 19/09/2018 11:32, Daniel Hellstrom wrote:
Hi,
When I rebased earlier this week four SMP test now fails (smp03,
smppsxaffinity01, smpschedaffinity04, smpschedaffinity05). After some
testing it turns out that after commit
cfc4231d8fe1056fa501508a929c8ccaa1dd11be ("score: Add f
Hi,
When I rebased earlier this week four SMP test now fails (smp03,
smppsxaffinity01, smpschedaffinity04, smpschedaffinity05). After some
testing it turns out that after commit
cfc4231d8fe1056fa501508a929c8ccaa1dd11be ("score: Add flexible per-CPU
data") the tests fails when
creating tasks
24 matches
Mail list logo